Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34602069›Full record

ArticleClinical epigenetics2021

DNA methylation profiling identifies two distinct subgroups in breast cancers with low hormone receptor expression, mainly associated with HER2 amplification status.

Philipp Jurmeister, Karsten Weber, Sonia Villegas, Thomas Karn, Michael Untch, Anne Thieme, Volkmar Müller, Eliane Taube, Peter Fasching, Wolfgang D Schmitt and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical epigenetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 56% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.

Philipp JurmeisterInstitute of Pathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117, Berlin, Germany. philipp.jurmeister@med.uni-muenchen.de.ORCID 0000-0001-7745-3794
Karsten WeberGerman Breast Group, 63263, Neu-Isenburg, Germany.
Sonia VillegasInstitute of Pathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Thomas KarnDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.
Michael UntchDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Breast Cancer Center, Helios-Klinikum Berlin, Buch, Germany.
Anne ThiemeGerman Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69210, Heidelberg, Germany.
Volkmar MüllerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Eliane TaubeInstitute of Pathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Peter FaschingBrustzentrum, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Wolfgang D SchmittInstitute of Pathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Frederik MarméDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Elmar StickelerKlinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Bruno V SinnInstitute of Pathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Paul JankInstitute of Pathology, Philipps-University Marburg and University Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Christian SchemMammazentrum Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Frederick KlauschenInstitute of Pathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Marion van MackelenberghUniversity Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany.
Carsten DenkertInstitute of Pathology, Philipps-University Marburg and University Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Sibylle LoiblGerman Breast Group, 63263, Neu-Isenburg, Germany.
David CapperGerman Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69210, Heidelberg, Germany.
German Cancer Research Center · DEHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DEGerman Breast group · DEPhilipps University of Marburg · DEGoethe University Frankfurt · DEHeidelberg University · DEHelios Hospital Berlin-Buch · DEMammazentrum Hamburg · DEUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversitätsklinikum Aachen · DEUniversitätsklinikum Erlangen · DEUniversity Hospital Schleswig-Holstein · DE

Funding

Deutsche Krebshilfe INTEGRATE-TNDeutsches Konsortien für Krebsforschung EPIC G8
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent clinical guidelines suggest that breast cancers with low hormone receptor expression (LowHR) in 1-10% of tumor cells should be regarded as hormone receptor positive. However, clinical data show that these patients have worse outcome compared to patients with hormone receptor expression above 10%. We performed DNA methylation profiling on 23 LowHR breast cancer specimens, including 13 samples with HER2 amplification and compared our results with a reference breast cancer cohort from The Cancer Genome Atlas to clarify the status for this infrequent but important patient subgroup.

resultsIn unsupervised clustering and dimensionality reduction, breast cancers with low hormone receptor expression that lacked HER2 amplification usually clustered with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) reference samples (8/10; "LowHR TNBC-like"). In contrast, most specimens with low hormone receptor expression and HER2 amplification grouped with hormone receptor positive cancers (11/13; "LowHR HRpos-like"). We observed highly similar DNA methylation patterns of LowHR TNBC-like samples and true TNBCs. Furthermore, the Ki67 proliferation index of LowHR TNBC-like samples and clinical outcome parameters were more similar to TNBCs and differed from LowHR HRpos-like cases.

conclusionsWe here demonstrate that LowHR breast cancer comprises two epigenetically distinct groups. Our data strongly suggest that LowHR TNBC-like samples are molecularly, histologically and clinically closely related to TNBC, while LowHR HRpos-like specimens are closely related to hormone receptor positive tumors.

Indexed as

AdultBreast NeoplasmsDNA MethylationErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleGene ExpressionHumansMiddle AgedERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID34602069
PMCPMC8489064
OpenAlexW3202514902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.