Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34602064›Full record

ArticleHuman resources for health2021

The role of community health workers in the surgical cascade: a scoping review.

Helen W Li, Michael L Scanlon, Nicholas Kisilu, Debra K Litzelman

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Human resources for health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Socioeconomic disadvantage and the risk for adverse post-operative outcomes after gynecologic cancer surgery.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Perspectives of community and facility stakeholders on community health workers in rural Malawi.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Helen W LiDepartment of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States of America. helenli@wustl.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-1437-2668
Michael L ScanlonIndiana University Center for Global Health, 702 Rotary Circle, Suite RO 101, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, United States of America.
Nicholas KisiluDepartment of General Surgery and Anesthesiology, Moi University School of Medicine, Eldoret, Kenya.
Debra K LitzelmanWilliam M. Tierney Center for Health Services Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc. and Indiana University School of Medicine, 1101 West 10th Street, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, United States of America.
Indiana University Health · USMoi University · KERegenstrief Institute · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommunity health workers (CHWs) can increase access to various primary healthcare services; however, their potential for improving surgical care is under-explored. We sought to assess the role of CHWs in the surgical cascade, defined as disease screening, linkage to operative care, and post-operative care. Given the well-described literature on CHWs and screening, we focused on the latter two steps of the surgical cascade.

methodsWe conducted a scoping review of the peer-reviewed literature. We searched for studies published in any language from January 1, 2000 to May 1, 2020 using electronic literature databases including Pubmed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and Google Scholar. We included articles on CHW involvement in linkage to operative care and/or post-operative surgical care. Narrative and descriptive methods were used to analyze the data.

resultsThe initial search identified 145 articles relevant to steps in the surgical cascade. Ten studies met our inclusion criteria and were included for review. In linkage to care, CHWs helped increase surgical enrollment, provide resources for vulnerable patients, and build trust in healthcare services. Post-operatively, CHWs acted as effective monitors for surgical-site infections and provided socially isolated patients with support and linkage to additional services. The complex and wide-ranging needs of surgical patients illustrated the need to view surgical care as a continuum rather than a singular operative event.

conclusionWhile the current literature is limited, CHWs were able to maneuver complex medical, cultural, and social barriers to surgical care by linking patients to counseling, education, and community resources, as well as post-operative infection prevention services. Future studies would benefit from more rigorous study designs and larger sample sizes to further elucidate the role CHWs can serve in the surgical cascade.

Indexed as

Community Health WorkersHealth ServicesHumansCHWCommunity health workersOutcomesSurgerySurgical cascade

Identifiers

PMID34602064
PMCPMC8489043
OpenAlexW3202923015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.