Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34601903›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2021

The benefits of being seen to help others: indirect reciprocity and reputation-based partner choice.

Gilbert Roberts, Nichola Raihani, Redouan Bshary, Héctor M Manrique, Andrea Farina, Flóra Samu, Pat Barclay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. One's Actions "Aging Poorly": An Integrative Egocentric Framework for Understanding Impression Management Errors and the Challenge of Temporal Impression Management.Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The social leverage effect: Institutions transform weak reputation effects into strong incentives for cooperation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Human and nonhuman norms: a dimensional framework.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  9. Group Formation and the Evolution of Human Social Organization.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Male services during between-group conflict: the 'hired gun' hypothesis revisited.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The complexity of human cooperation under indirect reciprocity.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gilbert RobertsIndependent Researcher, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5954-3243
Nichola RaihaniDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University College London, London WC1H 0AP, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2339-9889
Redouan BsharyDepartment of Biology, University of Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel 2009, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7198-8472
Héctor M ManriqueDepartment of Psicología y Sociología, Universidad de Zaragoza, Teruel, Teruel 44003, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1943-340X
Andrea FarinaLeiden University, Leiden, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands.
Flóra SamuLinköping University, Linköping, Östergötland, Sweden.
Pat BarclayDepartment of Psychology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1.ORCID 0000-0002-7905-9069

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When one individual helps another, it benefits the recipient and may also gain a reputation for being cooperative. This may induce others to favour the helper in subsequent interactions, so investing in being seen to help others may be adaptive. The best-known mechanism for this is indirect reciprocity (IR), in which the profit comes from an observer who pays a cost to benefit the original helper. IR has attracted considerable theoretical and empirical interest, but it is not the only way in which cooperative reputations can bring benefits. Signalling theory proposes that paying a cost to benefit others is a strategic investment which benefits the signaller through changing receiver behaviour, in particular by being more likely to choose the signaller as a partner. This reputation-based partner choice can result in competitive helping whereby those who help are favoured as partners. These theories have been confused in the literature. We therefore set out the assumptions, the mechanisms and the predictions of each theory for how developing a cooperative reputation can be adaptive. The benefits of being seen to be cooperative may have been a major driver of sociality, especially in humans. This article is part of the theme issue 'The language of cooperation: reputation and honest signalling'.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorSocial BehaviorHumansLanguagecooperationindirect reciprocitypartner choicereputations

Identifiers

PMID34601903
PMCPMC8487748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.