Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34601741›Full record

ArticleRisk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis2022

I Think, Therefore I Act: The Influence of Critical Reasoning Ability on Trust and Behavior During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Alex Segrè Cohen, Lauren Lutzke, Caitlin Drummond Otten, Joseph Árvai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Risk, Obligation, and Public Noncompliance with Mobility Directives in China during the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alex Segrè CohenDepartment of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6387-2197
Lauren LutzkeDepartment of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5289-8970
Caitlin Drummond OttenSchool of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6480-170X
Joseph ÁrvaiDepartment of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6065-0705

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Actively open-minded thinking (AOT) operates in three dimensions: it serves as a norm accounting for how one should search for and use information in judgment and decision making; it is a thinking style that one may adopt in accordance with the norm; and it sets standards for evaluating the thinking of others, particularly the trustworthiness of sources that claim authority. With the first and third dimensions in mind, we explore how AOT influences trust in public health experts, risk perceptions, and compliance with recommended behaviors aimed at slowing the spread and severity of the COVID-19 pandemic. Using survey data from a nationally representative sample of Americans (N = 857), we tested whether AOT will lead people to place greater trust public health experts (H1). Because these experts have been consistently messaging that COVID-19 is a real and serious threat to public health, we also hypothesized that trust in experts would be positively associated with high perceived risk (H2), which should have a positive influence on (self-reported) compliance with CDC recommendations (H3). And because AOT is a self-directed thinking style, we also expected it to directly influence risk perceptions and, by extension, compliance (H4). Our results support all four hypotheses. We discuss the implications of these results for how risk communication and risk management efforts are designed and practiced.

Indexed as

COVID-19HumansPandemicsPublic HealthSurveys and QuestionnairesTrustBehaviorCOVID-19critical reasoningrisk perceptiontrust

Identifiers

PMID34601741
PMCPMC8662233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.