Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34601696›Full record

ArticlePrimates; journal of primatology2021

Why do people visit primate tourism sites? Investigating macaque tourism in Japan and Indonesia.

Asmita Sengupta, Kanthi Arum Widayati, Yamato Tsuji, Risma Yanti, Muhammad Fadli Rahman, Nagarathna Balakrishna, Sindhu Radhakrishna

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Primates; journal of primatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Asmita SenguptaAshoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Kanthi Arum WidayatiDepartment of Biology, IPB University, Bogor, Indonesia.
Yamato TsujiPrimate Research Institute, Kyoto University, Inuyama, Aichi, Japan.
Risma YantiDepartment of Biology, IPB University, Bogor, Indonesia.
Muhammad Fadli RahmanDepartment of Biology, IPB University, Bogor, Indonesia.
Nagarathna BalakrishnaNational Institute of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Sindhu RadhakrishnaNational Institute of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India. sindhu.radhakrishna@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0870-071X

Funding

Department of Science and Technology, Govt of India DST/INSPIRE/04/2017/000124India-Japan Cooperative Science Programme (IJCSP) DST/INT/JSPS/P-250/2017Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JSPS KAKENHI (19K06837).
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primates are popular species in wildlife tourism contexts and provide economic benefits to habitat countries where primate-based tourism activities are a part of the country's tourism economy. Primate tourism runs a broad gamut from safari-like expeditions within remote primate habitats to designated monkey parks and incidental primate tourism. In most forms of primate tourism, primate ecology and behaviour are directly influenced by humans, making these interfaces particularly relevant for examination using the lens of ethnoprimatology. While several studies have assessed the impact of tourism on primates, little is known about people's motivations for observing monkeys for recreational purposes. Here we present two case studies-the Jigokudani Monkey Park, Japan, and the Telaga Warna Nature Recreational Park, Indonesia-where we provide quantitative assessments of people's motivations for visiting managed (monkey parks) and unmanaged (incidental) monkey tourism sites. We further show that management regimes, socio-demographic attributes, previous experience of interactions with macaques, and feeding them play a role in people's desire to visit macaque tourism sites. In Japan, those who had interacted with macaques before were more likely to visit the park to observe macaques clearly and at close quarters. In contrast, respondents in Indonesia were more interested in the recreational opportunities offered by the nature reserve rather than in macaques. However, here too, people who had interacted with macaques earlier were more likely to visit incidental macaque tourist sites for the sole purpose of viewing or interacting with macaques. Almost 50% of the Japanese respondents visited the monkey park due to personal inclinations, while less than 14% of people in Indonesia visited the park of their own volition. Also, over 57% of the Japanese respondents said that visiting monkey parks helped them gain a better understanding of macaque behaviour, whereas only about 26% respondents said likewise in Indonesia. Unlike the Japanese respondents, most of the Indonesian respondents engaged in feeding macaques. These findings suggest that management regimes as well as socio-demographic attributes may influence people's motivations to visit macaque tourism sites.

Indexed as

MacacaTourismAnimalsIndonesiaJapanPrimatesIndonesiaJapanJapanese macaqueLong-tailed macaqueProvisioningTourism

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.