Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34601391›Full record

ArticleComputers in biology and medicine2021

Deep multiple-instance learning for abnormal cell detection in cervical histopathology images.

Anabik Pal, Zhiyun Xue, Kanan Desai, Adekunbiola Aina F Banjo, Clement Akinfolarin Adepiti, L Rodney Long, Mark Schiffman, Sameer Antani

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computers in biology and medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Data Characterization for Reliable AI in Medicine.Recent trends in image processing and pattern recognition : 5th International Conference, RTIP2R 2022, Kingsville, TX, USA, December 01-02, 2022, revised selected papers. International Conference on Recent Trends in Image Processing and... · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Anabik PalNational Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. Electronic address: anabik.pal@nih.gov.
Zhiyun XueNational Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Kanan DesaiNational Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Adekunbiola Aina F BanjoCollege of Medicine, Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Idi-araba, Lagos, Nigeria.
Clement Akinfolarin AdepitiObafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospital, Osun State, Nigeria.
L Rodney LongNational Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Mark SchiffmanNational Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Sameer AntaniNational Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
National Institutes of Health · USEkiti State University · NGLagos University Teaching Hospital · NG

Funding

Machine learning and artificial intelligence research for clinical medical image processingZIALM010018 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI ANTANI, SAMEER · 2021 to 2025
$9.0M
Image analysis and machine learning for cervical cancer diagnosticsZIALM010014 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI ANTANI, SAMEER · 2018 to 2020
$1.7M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 LM999999Intramural NIH HHS ZIA LM010014Intramural NIH HHS ZIA LM010018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cervical cancer is a disease of significant concern affecting women's health worldwide. Early detection of and treatment at the precancerous stage can help reduce mortality. High-grade cervical abnormalities and precancer are confirmed using microscopic analysis of cervical histopathology. However, manual analysis of cervical biopsy slides is time-consuming, needs expert pathologists, and suffers from reader variability errors. Prior work in the literature has suggested using automated image analysis algorithms for analyzing cervical histopathology images captured with the whole slide digital scanners (e.g., Aperio, Hamamatsu, etc.). However, whole-slide digital tissue scanners with good optical magnification and acceptable imaging quality are cost-prohibitive and difficult to acquire in low and middle-resource regions. Hence, the development of low-cost imaging systems and automated image analysis algorithms are of critical importance. Motivated by this, we conduct an experimental study to assess the feasibility of developing a low-cost diagnostic system with the H&E stained cervical tissue image analysis algorithm. In our imaging system, the image acquisition is performed by a smartphone affixing it on the top of a commonly available light microscope which magnifies the cervical tissues. The images are not captured in a constant optical magnification, and, unlike whole-slide scanners, our imaging system is unable to record the magnification. The images are mega-pixel images and are labeled based on the presence of abnormal cells. In our dataset, there are total 1331 (train: 846, validation: 116 test: 369) images. We formulate the classification task as a deep multiple instance learning problem and quantitatively evaluate the classification performance of four different types of multiple instance learning algorithms trained with five different architectures designed with varying instance sizes. Finally, we designed a sparse attention-based multiple instance learning framework that can produce a maximum of 84.55% classification accuracy on the test set.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAlgorithmsFemaleHumansMicroscopyCervical histopathologyDatasetHigh dimensional imagesMultiple instance learningSparse attention

Identifiers

PMID34601391
PMCPMC11977668
OpenAlexW3202910984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.