Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34601321›Full record

ArticleEpidemics2021

Rational evaluation of various epidemic models based on the COVID-19 data of China.

Wuyue Yang, Dongyan Zhang, Liangrong Peng, Changjing Zhuge, Liu Hong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A probabilistic epidemiological model for infectious diseases: The case of COVID-19 at global-level.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2023
    Article
  13. Bounding pandemic spread by heat spread.Journal of engineering mathematics · 2023
    Article
  14. Quantifying Social Interventions for Combating COVID-19 via a Symmetry-Based Model.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wuyue YangYau Mathematical Sciences Center, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, PR China.
Dongyan ZhangBeijing Institute for Scientific and Engineering Computing, Faculty of Science, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, PR China.
Liangrong PengCollege of Mathematics and Data Science, Minjiang University, Fuzhou, 350108, PR China.
Changjing ZhugeBeijing Institute for Scientific and Engineering Computing, Faculty of Science, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, PR China. Electronic address: zhuge@bjut.edu.cn.
Liu HongSchool of Mathematics, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510275, PR China. Electronic address: hongliu@sysu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper, based on the Akaike information criterion, root mean square error and robustness coefficient, a rational evaluation of various epidemic models/methods, including seven empirical functions, four statistical inference methods and five dynamical models, on their forecasting abilities is carried out. With respect to the outbreak data of COVID-19 epidemics in China, we find that before the inflection point, all models fail to make a reliable prediction. The Logistic function consistently underestimates the final epidemic size, while the Gompertz's function makes an overestimation in all cases. Towards statistical inference methods, the methods of sequential Bayesian and time-dependent reproduction number are more accurate at the late stage of an epidemic. And the transition-like behavior of exponential growth method from underestimation to overestimation with respect to the inflection point might be useful for constructing a more reliable forecast. Compared to ODE-based SIR, SEIR and SEIR-AHQ models, the SEIR-QD and SEIR-PO models generally show a better performance on studying the COVID-19 epidemics, whose success we believe could be attributed to a proper trade-off between model complexity and fitting accuracy. Our findings not only are crucial for the forecast of COVID-19 epidemics, but also may apply to other infectious diseases.

Indexed as

COVID-19EpidemicsBayes TheoremChinaHumansSARS-CoV-2Akaike information criterionCOVID-19Epidemic sizeModel evaluationRobustness

Identifiers

PMID34601321
PMCPMC8464399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.