Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34601240›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of medical informatics2021

Predicting prognosis in COVID-19 patients using machine learning and readily available clinical data.

Thomas W Campbell, Melissa P Wilson, Heinrich Roder, Samantha MaWhinney, Robert W Georgantas, Laura K Maguire, Joanna Roder, Kristine M Erlandson

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of medical informatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. [A Transformer-based model using laboratory indicators efficiently differentiates ovarian cancer].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Retrospective Post-Hospitalisation COVID-19 Mortality Risk Assessment of Patients in South Africa.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Thomas W CampbellBiodesix, United States. Electronic address: thomas.campbell@biodesix.com.
Melissa P WilsonDepartment of Medicine, Division of Personalized Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Colorado-Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.
Heinrich RoderBiodesix, United States.
Samantha MaWhinneyDepartment of Biostatistics and Informatics, University of Colorado, Colorado School of Public Health, United States.
Robert W GeorgantasBiodesix, United States.
Laura K MaguireBiodesix, United States.
Joanna RoderBiodesix, United States.
Kristine M ErlandsonDepartment of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Colorado-Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.
Helix Biomedix (United States) · USUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · USColorado School of Public Health · USNational Biodiversity Institute · CR

Funding

NIH Prior Approval Process ProfessionalUL1TR002535 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI SOKOL, RONALD J. · 2018 to 2022
$51.1M
Predictors of Recovery and the App-Facilitated Tele-Rehabilitation (AFTER) Program for COVID SurvivorsR01AG054366 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI ERLANDSON, KRISTINE MACE · 2016 to 2020
$3.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002535NIA NIH HHS R01 AG054366
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationalePrognostic tools for aiding in the treatment of hospitalized COVID-19 patients could help improve outcome by identifying patients at higher or lower risk of severe disease. The study objective was to develop models to stratify patients by risk of severe outcomes during COVID-19 hospitalization using readily available information at hospital admission.

methodsHierarchical ensemble classification models were trained on a set of 229 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 to predict severe outcomes, including ICU admission, development of acute respiratory distress syndrome, or intubation, using easily attainable attributes including basic patient characteristics, vital signs at admission, and basic lab results collected at time of presentation. Each test stratifies patients into groups of increasing risk. An additional cohort of 330 patients was used for blinded, independent validation. Shapley value analysis evaluated which attributes contributed most to the models' predictions of risk. MAIN

resultsTest performance was assessed using precision (positive predictive value) and recall (sensitivity) of the final risk groups. All test cut-offs were fixed prior to blinded validation. In development and validation, the tests achieved precision in the lowest risk groups near or above 0.9. The proportion of patients with severe outcomes significantly increased across increasing risk groups. While the importance of attributes varied by test and patient, C-reactive protein, lactate dehydrogenase, and D-dimer were often found to be important in the assignment of risk.

conclusionsRisk of severe outcomes for patients hospitalized with COVID-19 infection can be assessed using machine learning-based models based on attributes routinely collected at hospital admission.

Indexed as

COVID-19HumansMachine LearningPrognosisSARS-CoV-2Clinical decision support systemsCOVID-19Machine learningPrognostic modelsRisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID34601240
PMCPMC8459591
OpenAlexW3202689906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.