Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34601225›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in immunology2021

Regulation of myeloid-cell activation.

Joseph T Greene, Ben F Brian, S Erandika Senevirathne, Tanya S Freedman

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in immunology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Double negative T cells (CD4Frontiers in immunology · 2026
    Article
  7. Submicron-Sampling of Living Cells by Macrophages.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Application of mass cytometry in the immune microenvironment of breast cancer.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. CNS Resident Innate Immune Cells: Guardians of CNS Homeostasis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joseph T GreeneDepartment of Pharmacology, Center for Immunology, Masonic Cancer Center, and Center for Autoimmune Diseases Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, United States.
Ben F BrianDepartment of Pharmacology, Center for Immunology, Masonic Cancer Center, and Center for Autoimmune Diseases Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, United States.
S Erandika SenevirathneDepartment of Pharmacology, Center for Immunology, Masonic Cancer Center, and Center for Autoimmune Diseases Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, United States.
Tanya S FreedmanDepartment of Pharmacology, Center for Immunology, Masonic Cancer Center, and Center for Autoimmune Diseases Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, United States. Electronic address: tfreedma@umn.edu.
University of Minnesota Medical Center · US

Funding

Training in PharmacoNeuroImmune Substance Abuse ResearchT32DA007097 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI MOLITOR, THOMAS WILLIAM · 1985 to 2021
$13.1M
TRAINING GRANT IN MICROBIOLOGY/CANCER RESEARCHT32CA009138 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI Scott M. Dehm · 1985 to 2026
$11.3M
Roles of the Src-Family Kinases LynA and LynB in Macrophage Inflammatory SignalingR01AR073966 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI FREEDMAN, TANYA S. · 2018 to 2022
$2.2M
Generating LynA-/- and LynB-/- mice by CRISPR/Cas9 genome editingR03AI130978 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI FREEDMAN, TANYA S. · 2017 to 2018
$153k
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009138NIAID NIH HHS R03 AI130978NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR073966NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007097
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Myeloid cells (macrophages, monocytes, dendritic cells, and granulocytes) survey the body for signs of infection and damage and regulate tissue homeostasis, organogenesis, and immunity. They express receptors that initiate the inflammatory response, send signals that alter the vascular and cytokine milieu, and oversee the recruitment, differentiation, and activation of other myeloid and adaptive immune cells. Their activation must therefore be tightly regulated, optimized for maximal innate-immune protection with a minimum of collateral tissue damage or disorganization. In this review we discuss what it means for myeloid cells to become activated, with emphasis on the receptors and signaling molecules important for the recognition of pathogen-associated and damage-associated molecular patterns. We also outline how these signals are regulated by the steric properties of proteins, by adhesive and cytoskeletal interactions, and by negative feedback to keep inflammation in check and support healthy tissue development and homeostasis. Throughout the text we highlight recent publications and reviews and direct readers therein for a comprehensive bibliography.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell DifferentiationCytoskeletonHomeostasisHumansImmunity, InnateInflammationMyeloid CellsOrganogenesisSignal Transduction

Identifiers

PMID34601225
PMCPMC8648988
OpenAlexW3204444017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.