Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34601143›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases2021

Performance of the T-SPOT

Margaret Kruse, Chris Dark, Megan Aspden, Daniel Cochrane, Rick Competiello, Maya Peltz, Luis Torres, Peter Wrighton-Smith, Magdalena Dudek

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Pediatric cancer patients vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2-a clinical and laboratory follow-up.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Performance of T-TrackDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Margaret KruseOxford Immunotec, 293 Boston Post Rd W, Marlborough, MA 01752, USA. Electronic address: mkruse@oxfordimmunotec.com.
Chris DarkOxford Immunotec, 143 Park Drive, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxfordshire OX14 4SE, UK. Electronic address: cdark@oxfordimmunotec.com.
Megan AspdenOxford Immunotec, 143 Park Drive, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxfordshire OX14 4SE, UK. Electronic address: maspden@oxfordimmunotec.com.
Daniel CochraneOxford Immunotec, 143 Park Drive, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxfordshire OX14 4SE, UK. Electronic address: dcochrane@oxfordimmunotec.com.
Rick CompetielloOxford Immunotec, 293 Boston Post Rd W, Marlborough, MA 01752, USA. Electronic address: rcompetiello@oxfordimmunotec.com.
Maya PeltzOxford Immunotec, 293 Boston Post Rd W, Marlborough, MA 01752, USA. Electronic address: mpeltz@oxfordimmunotec.com.
Luis TorresPrimacare Medical Center, 277 Pleasant St, Fall River, MA 02721, USA. Electronic address: ltorres@neccr.com.
Peter Wrighton-SmithOxford Immunotec, 143 Park Drive, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxfordshire OX14 4SE, UK. Electronic address: pwrighton-smith@oxfordimmunotec.com.
Magdalena DudekOxford Immunotec, 143 Park Drive, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxfordshire OX14 4SE, UK. Electronic address: mdudek@oxfordimmunotec.com.
Evotec (United Kingdom) · GBEvotec (United States) · USBristol Community College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the performance of the T-SPOT.COVID test for identifying SARS-CoV-2-responsive T-cells in participants with SARS-CoV-2 infection.

methodsThe T-SPOT.COVID test uses ELISpot interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA) methodology to measure T cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 spike S1 and nucleocapsid peptides. T-SPOT.COVID and anti-N immunoglobulin (Ig) G serology tests were performed on blood from 186 patients with nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT)-confirmed-SARS-CoV-2 infection and 100 control group participants.

resultsIn the 2-8 weeks after NAAT-diagnosed SARS-CoV-2 infection, the T-SPOT.COVID test detected 98.4% (63 of 64) of infected participants, while anti-N IgG serology detected 82.8%. In the first 2 weeks after diagnosis, during adaptive immune response activation, there were less reactive T-SPOT.COVID responses (75.7%, 28 of 37 infected participants) and many less seropositive responses (32.4%). Response numbers tapered after 8 weeks; however, T-SPOT.COVID test continued to detect most participants with confirmed infection (83.6%, 56 of 67) and continued to out-perform serology (52.2%). T-SPOT.COVID response due to cross-reactive T cells was ruled out by demonstrating that, of 44 control group participants with T cells responsive to 4 human common cold coronavirus peptides, only 1 was T-SPOT.COVID reactive.

conclusionThe T-SPOT.COVID test performed well in detecting SARS-CoV-2-sensitized T-cells over many months.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2Antibodies, ViralHumansImmunoglobulin GSerologic TestsT-LymphocytesAntibodies, ViralImmunoglobulin GCOVID-19IGRAinterferon-gamma release assaySARS-CoV-2serologyT-SPOT.COVID

Identifiers

PMID34601143
PMCPMC8482551
OpenAlexW3204923285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.