Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34600528›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2021

Why women choose to deliver at home in India: a study of prevalence, factors, and socio-economic inequality.

Ratna Patel, Strong P Marbaniang, Shobhit Srivastava, Pradeep Kumar, Shekhar Chauhan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ratna PatelDepartment of Public Health and Mortality Studies, International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai, India.ORCID 0000-0002-5371-7369
Strong P MarbaniangDepartment of Public Health and Mortality Studies, International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai, India.ORCID 0000-0001-5347-1867
Shobhit SrivastavaDepartment of Mathematical Demography and Statistics, International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai, India.ORCID 0000-0002-7138-4916
Pradeep KumarDepartment of Mathematical Demography and Statistics, International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai, India.ORCID 0000-0003-4259-820X
Shekhar ChauhanDepartment of Population Policies and Programmes, International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai, India. shekhariips2486@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-6926-7649
International Institute for Population Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo promote institutional delivery, the Government of India, through the Janani Suraksha Yojana (JSY) program, gives monetary reward to all pregnant women who give birth at the government or private health center. Despite providing cash assistance, a higher number of women are still preferring delivering at home. Therefore, this study sought to determine the prevalence of home births and identifying the factors influencing women's choice of home deliveries.

methodsData from the National Family Health Survey (NFHS) conducted during 2005-06 and 2015-16 were used in the study. The respondents were women 15-49 years; a sample of 36,850 and 190,898 women in 2005-06 and 2015-16 respectively were included in the study. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine the factors influencing home delivery. Income-related inequality in home delivery was quantified by the concentration index (CI) and the concentration curve (CC), and decomposition analysis was used to examine the inequality in the prevalence of home deliveries.

resultsThe prevalence of home deliveries has reduced from 58.5% in 2005-06 to 18.9% in 2015-16. The odds of delivering babies at home were lower among women who had full ANC in 2005-06 [AOR: 0.34; CI: 0.28-0.41] and in 2015-16 [AOR: 0.41; CI: 0.38-0.45] and were higher among women with four or higher parity in 2005-06 [AOR: 1.70; CI: 1.49-1.92] and in 2015-19 [AOR: 2.16; CI: 2.03-2.30]. Furthermore, the odds of delivering babies at home were higher among rural women and were lower among women with higher education. It was found that the value of CI increased from - 0.25 to - 0.39 from 2005-06 to 2015-16; this depicts that women delivering babies at home got more concentrated among women from lower socio-economic status.

conclusionThere is a need to promote institutional deliveries, particular focus to be given to poor women, women with higher parity, uneducated women, and rural women. ANC is the most concurring contact point for mothers to get relevant information about the risks and complications they may encounter during delivery. Therefore, effort should be directed to provide full ANC. Targeted interventions are called for to bring improvements in rural areas.

Indexed as

Maternal Health ServicesDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHumansIndiaPregnancyPrenatal CarePrevalenceSocial ClassSocioeconomic FactorsHome deliveryIndiaPlace of deliverySocio-economic inequality

Identifiers

PMID34600528
PMCPMC8487549
OpenAlexW3129248723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.