ArticleBMC public health2021
Why women choose to deliver at home in India: a study of prevalence, factors, and socio-economic inequality.
Article in BMC public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- From Decision to Delivery: A Qualitative Study of Non-Institutional Birth Pathways in Northern India.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Heatwaves and Home Births: Understanding the Impact of Extreme Heat on Place of Delivery in India.GeoHealth · 2025Article
- Examining the unfair concentration of non-institutional deliveries among poor households in India: a study of predictors and wealth-based inequality.BMC women's health · 2025Article
- Trends, spatial distribution and determinants of maternal home deliveries in Zambia.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Determinants of public institutional births in India: An analysis using the National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5) factsheet data.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2024Article
- Association between the use of Accredited Social Health Activist (ASHA) services and uptake of institutional deliveries in India.PLOS global public health · 2024Article
- Factors associated with inadequate receipt of components and non-use of antenatal care services in India: a regional analysis.BMC public health · 2023Article
- Measurement and mapping of maternal health service coverage through a novel composite index: a sub-national level analysis in India.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2022Article
- Institutional deliveries in India's nine low performing states: levels, determinants and accessibility.Global health action · 2021Article
- Gone and Forgotten? Predictors of Birth History Omissions in India.Demographic researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo promote institutional delivery, the Government of India, through the Janani Suraksha Yojana (JSY) program, gives monetary reward to all pregnant women who give birth at the government or private health center. Despite providing cash assistance, a higher number of women are still preferring delivering at home. Therefore, this study sought to determine the prevalence of home births and identifying the factors influencing women's choice of home deliveries.
methodsData from the National Family Health Survey (NFHS) conducted during 2005-06 and 2015-16 were used in the study. The respondents were women 15-49 years; a sample of 36,850 and 190,898 women in 2005-06 and 2015-16 respectively were included in the study. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine the factors influencing home delivery. Income-related inequality in home delivery was quantified by the concentration index (CI) and the concentration curve (CC), and decomposition analysis was used to examine the inequality in the prevalence of home deliveries.
resultsThe prevalence of home deliveries has reduced from 58.5% in 2005-06 to 18.9% in 2015-16. The odds of delivering babies at home were lower among women who had full ANC in 2005-06 [AOR: 0.34; CI: 0.28-0.41] and in 2015-16 [AOR: 0.41; CI: 0.38-0.45] and were higher among women with four or higher parity in 2005-06 [AOR: 1.70; CI: 1.49-1.92] and in 2015-19 [AOR: 2.16; CI: 2.03-2.30]. Furthermore, the odds of delivering babies at home were higher among rural women and were lower among women with higher education. It was found that the value of CI increased from - 0.25 to - 0.39 from 2005-06 to 2015-16; this depicts that women delivering babies at home got more concentrated among women from lower socio-economic status.
conclusionThere is a need to promote institutional deliveries, particular focus to be given to poor women, women with higher parity, uneducated women, and rural women. ANC is the most concurring contact point for mothers to get relevant information about the risks and complications they may encounter during delivery. Therefore, effort should be directed to provide full ANC. Targeted interventions are called for to bring improvements in rural areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.