Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34600102›Full record

SynthesisNeuroImage2021

Multi-band FMRI compromises detection of mesolimbic reward responses.

Tara Srirangarajan, Leili Mortazavi, Tiago Bortolini, Jorge Moll, Brian Knutson

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in NeuroImage, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Common and Distinct Neural Substrates for Approach- and Avoidance-Motivated Actions.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  3. Altered reward-related resting-state network properties in adolescent cannabis use and depression.Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Prior novelty invigorates future mesolimbic target detection.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Prior Novelty Invigorates Future Mesolimbic Target Detection.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tara SrirangarajanDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.
Leili MortazaviDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.
Tiago BortoliniD'Or Institute for Research and Education (IDOR), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Jorge MollDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States; D'Or Institute for Research and Education (IDOR), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Brian KnutsonDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States. Electronic address: knutson@stanford.edu.

Funding

Training CoreP50DA042012 · NIDA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Karl A. Deisseroth, Lisa Giocomo · 2017 to 2026
$27.1M
NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA042012
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent innovations in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (FMRI) have sped data collection by enabling simultaneous scans of neural activity in multiple brain locations, but have these innovations come at a cost? In a meta-analysis and preregistered direct comparison of original data, we examined whether acquiring FMRI data with multi-band versus single-band scanning protocols might compromise detection of mesolimbic activity during reward processing. Meta-analytic results (n = 44 studies; cumulative n = 5005 subjects) indicated that relative to single-band scans, multi-band scans showed significantly decreased effect sizes for reward anticipation in the Nucleus Accumbens (NAcc) by more than half. Direct within-subject comparison of single-band versus multi-band scanning data (multi-band factors = 4 and 8; n = 12 subjects) acquired during repeated administration of the Monetary Incentive Delay task indicated that reductions in temporal signal-to-noise ratio could account for compromised detection of task-related responses in mesolimbic regions (i.e., the NAcc). Together, these findings imply that researchers should opt for single-band over multi-band scanning protocols when probing mesolimbic responses with FMRI. The findings also have implications for inferring mesolimbic activity during related tasks and rest, for summarizing historical results, and for using neuroimaging data to track individual differences in reward-related brain activity.

Indexed as

RewardHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMotivationNeuroimagingNucleus AccumbensSignal-To-Noise RatioAccumbensAnticipationFrontalFunctional magnetic resonance imagingHumanMonetary incentive delayMulti-bandReward

Identifiers

PMID34600102
PMCPMC8626533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.