Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34599920›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine2021

De-implementation of cervical cancer screening before age 21.

Michelle I Silver, Melissa L Anderson, Elisabeth F Beaber, Jennifer S Haas, Sarah Kobrin, Gaia Pocobelli, Celette Sugg Skinner, Jasmin A Tiro, Aruna Kamineni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Michelle I SilverDivision of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States of America. Electronic address: Michelle.silver@wustl.edu.
Melissa L AndersonKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Elisabeth F BeaberPublic Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Jennifer S HaasDivision of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Sarah KobrinDivision of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, United States of America.
Gaia PocobelliKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Celette Sugg SkinnerDepartment of Population & Data Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America; Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America.
Jasmin A TiroDepartment of Population & Data Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America; Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America.
Aruna KamineniKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States of America.

Funding

PROSPR METRICS CISNET Collaboration Investigating Impact of Structural Racism/Discrimination on Cervical Screening Moonshot SupplementUM1CA221940 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI CHUBAK, JESSICA, HAAS, JENNIFER S · 2018 to 2023
$15.9M
Washington University Paul Calabresi K12 Career Development Award for Clinical OncologyK12CA167540 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI John F. Dipersio, Ramaswamy Govindan · 2012 to 2026
$11.7M
Coordinating Center for Population-based Research to Optimize Cancer Screening (PROSPR) (U24)U24CA221936 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI LI, CHRISTOPHER I, ZHENG, YINGYE · 2018 to 2023
$5.7M
NCI NIH HHS K12 CA167540NCI NIH HHS U24 CA221936NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA221940
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2012, United States consensus guidelines were modified to recommend that cervical cancer screening not begin before age 21 and, since 2014, the Health Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS), a health plan quality measurement too, has included a measure for non-recommended cervical cancer screening among females ages 16-20. Our goal was to describe prevalence over time of cervical cancer screening before age 21 following the 2012 guideline change, and provide information to help understand how rapidly new guidelines may be disseminated and implemented into clinical practice. We used longitudinal clinical and administrative data from three diverse healthcare systems in the Population-based Research to Optimize the Screening Process (PROSPR II) consortium to examine annual trends in screening before age 21. We identified 55,316 average-risk, screening-eligible females ages 18-20 between 2011 and 2017. For each calendar year, we estimated the proportion of females who received a Papanicolaou (Pap) test. We observed a steady decline in the proportion of females under age 21 who received a Pap test, from an average of 8.3% in 2011 to <1% in 2017 across the sites. The observed steady decline suggests growing adherence to the 2012 consensus guidelines. This trend was consistent across diverse geographic regions, healthcare systems, and patient populations, strengthening the generalizability of the results; however, since we only had 1-2 years of study data prior to the consensus guidelines, we cannot discern whether screening under age 21 was already in decline. Nonetheless, these results provide data to compare with other guideline changes to de-implement non-recommended screening practices.

Indexed as

Uterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdolescentAdultEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMass ScreeningPapanicolaou TestUnited StatesVaginal SmearsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID34599920
PMCPMC8802556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.