Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34599686›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2022

Transcutaneous vagal nerve simulation to reduce a systemic inflammatory response syndrome and the associated intestinal failure: study protocol of a prospective, two-armed, sham-controlled, double-blinded trial in healthy subjects (the NeuroSIRS-Study).

Cornelius J van Beekum, Martin W von Websky, Maria A Willis, Christina Panknin, Martin Coenen, Rolf Fimmers, Jörg C Kalff, Sven Wehner, Tim O Vilz

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Mechanism and Applications of Vagus Nerve Stimulation.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cornelius J van BeekumDepartment of General, Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3347-2675
Martin W von WebskyDepartment of General, Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Maria A WillisDepartment of General, Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Christina PankninClinical Study Core Unit, Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Martin CoenenClinical Study Core Unit, Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Rolf FimmersClinical Study Core Unit, Institute of Medical Biometrics, Informatics and Epidemiology, Study Center, University Hospital of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Jörg C KalffDepartment of General, Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Sven WehnerDepartment of General, Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Tim O VilzDepartment of General, Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Bonn, Bonn, Germany. tim.vilz@ukbonn.de.
University Hospital Bonn · DE

Funding

Faculty of Medicine of the University of Bonn 2017-FKS-05
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSurgery initiates pro-inflammatory mediator cascades leading to a variably pronounced sterile inflammation (SIRS). SIRS is associated with intestinal paralysis and breakdown of intestinal barrier and might result in abdominal sepsis. Technological progress led to the development of a neurostimulator for transcutaneous auricular vagal nerve stimulation (taVNS), which is associated with a decline in inflammatory parameters and peristalsis improvement in rodents and healthy subjects via activation of the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway. Therefore, taVNS might be a strategy for SIRS prophylaxis.

methodsThe NeuroSIRS-Study is a prospective, randomized two-armed, sham-controlled, double-blind clinical trial. The study is registered at DRKS00016892 (09.07.2020). A controlled endotoxemia is used as a SIRS-mimicking model. 2 ng/kg bodyweight lipopolysaccharide (LPS) will be administered after taVNS or sham stimulation. The primary objective is a reduction of clinical symptoms of SIRS after taVNS compared to sham stimulation. Effects of taVNS on release of inflammatory cytokines, intestinal function, and vital parameters will be analyzed. DISCUSSION: TaVNS is well-tolerated, with little to no side effects. Despite not fully mimicking postoperative inflammation, LPS challenge is the most used experimental tool to imitate SIRS and offers standardization and reproducibility. The restriction to healthy male volunteers exerts a certain bias limiting generalizability to the surgical population. Still, this pilot study aims to give first insights into taVNS as a prophylactic treatment in postoperative inflammation to pave the way for further clinical trials in patients at risk for SIRS. This would have major implications for future therapeutic approaches.

Indexed as

Intestinal FailureTranscutaneous Electric Nerve StimulationVagus Nerve StimulationHealthy VolunteersHumansMalePilot ProjectsProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReproducibility of ResultsSystemic Inflammatory Response SyndromeCholinergic anti-inflammatory pathwayIleusInflammationIntestinal barrierSIRSVagal nerve stimulation

Identifiers

PMID34599686
PMCPMC8760201
OpenAlexW3203861070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.