ArticleMolecular ecology resources2022
Estimating the time since admixture from phased and unphased molecular data.
Article in Molecular ecology resources, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Identifying Single-Origin Rare Variants in Population Genomic Data.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025Article
- Analytical expectations for ancestry junction accumulation in admixed genomes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Genomic evidence of contemporary hybridization between Schistosoma species.PLoS pathogens · 2022Article
- Estimating the time since admixture from phased and unphased molecular data.Molecular ecology resources · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
After admixture, recombination breaks down genomic blocks of contiguous ancestry. The breakdown of these blocks forms a new "molecular clock" that ticks at a much faster rate than the mutation clock, enabling accurate dating of admixture events in the recent past. However, existing theory on the breakdown of these blocks, or the accumulation of delineations between blocks, so-called "junctions", has mostly been limited to using regularly spaced markers on phased data. Here, we present an extension to the theory of junctions using the ancestral recombination graph that describes the expected number of junctions for any distribution of markers along the genome. Furthermore, we provide a new framework to infer the time since admixture using unphased data. We demonstrate both the phased and unphased methods on simulated data and show that our new extensions have improved accuracy with respect to previous methods, especially for smaller population sizes and more ancient admixture times. Lastly, we demonstrate the applicability of our method on three empirical data sets, including labcrosses of yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisae) and two case studies of hybridization in swordtail fish and Populus trees.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.