Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34599487›Full record

ArticleCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2022

The reward positivity is sensitive to affective liking.

Darin R Brown, Trevor C J Jackson, James F Cavanagh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The reward positivity is insensitive to reinforcer devaluation.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The reward positivity is insensitive to reinforcer devaluation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Darin R BrownPsychology Field Group, Pitzer College, Claremont, CA, 91711, USA. darinb@pitzer.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8792-0090
Trevor C J JacksonDepartment of Psychology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, 87131, USA.
James F CavanaghDepartment of Psychology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, 87131, USA.

Funding

A Novel Bench-to-Bedside Translational Model of AnhedoniaR01MH119382 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO · PI CAVANAGH, JAMES F · 2019 to 2023
$1.8M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH119382
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The EEG feature known as the Reward Positivity (RewP) is elicited by reward receipt and appears to reflect sensitively and specifically positive prediction errors during reinforcement learning. Yet, the RewP also is modulated by state and trait affect, suggesting that it has a more complex computational role than simple reinforcement surprise. We conducted a series of experiments aimed to investigate underlying affect processing reflected in the RewP during a reinforcement learning task. In the first experiment (N = 25), we manipulated the type of rewards a person could win (simple points or hedonically-appraised pictures). Although there were no differences in the amplitudes of the RewP for different types of rewards, there was a significant correlation between the individual rating of liking for the images and RewP amplitude. In a second experiment (N = 25), we manipulated reinforcement rates (easy vs. hard) and affective picture content (liked vs. ambivalent) to examine the potential interaction of prediction error and liking on RewP amplitude. We again found a significant relationship between liking and RewP amplitude, however, only in the hard condition. These findings suggest that the RewP reflects cortical computations of reward surprise as well as hedonic liking, identifying it as a possible nexus where multidimensional value is computed.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsHumansLearningReinforcement, PsychologyRewardAffectEmotionLikingPrediction errorReward positivity

Identifiers

PMID34599487
PMCPMC9578330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.