ArticleInternational journal of clinical oncology2022
Changes of cancer diagnosis disclosure to children in Japan in the last 20 years.
Article in International journal of clinical oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Communicating cancer diagnoses with children in Japan: A qualitative study of healthcare professionals' beliefs and approaches in pediatric oncology.Palliative care and social practice · 2026Article
- Healthcare professionals' perspectives on disclosure of diagnosis and related issues in childhood cancer: A mixed methods systematic review.International journal of nursing sciences · 2026Review
- The implementation and strategy of triadic communication in pediatric oncology: a scoping review.Pediatric research · 2025Article
- Developing and evaluating a cancer communication picture book for children, families, and health care professionals: A mixed-methods feasibility study.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe practice of cancer diagnosis disclosure to children has been changed with the times. The regulations of clinical trials in the 2000s might change the practice in Japan. However, the perspective of this topic among children and adults has not been investigated in detail.
methodsWe studied changes in the practice of information sharing with children with cancer at pediatric cancer centers and the perspective of cancer diagnosis disclosure to children among school children, their parents and pediatric oncologists in the last 20 years by comparing the results of questionnaire surveys conducted in 1998, 2008 and 2018.
resultsThis study revealed that the performing rate has increased with the times, but the institutions actively performing for children aged 7-9 years were 36.4% even in the 2018 survey. More than 70% of children wished diagnosis disclosure if they suffer from cancer in the series of surveys, while the ratio of parents who tell cancer diagnosis to their children hovered at 34.5 to 53.7% (p < 0.001 in all surveys). The ratio of pediatric oncologists having the policy to perform diagnosis disclosure proactively increased from 9.3 to 60.0%, while that of parents having the same policy stayed at 5.3% even in 2018.
conclusionsThe performing rate of information sharing with children with cancer was significantly changed in the last 20 years. The opinion gaps were observed between parents and children and between parents and pediatric oncologists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.