Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34599393›Full record

ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2021

The Price of Progress: Cost, Access, and Adoption of Novel Cardiovascular Drugs in Clinical Practice.

Merilyn S Varghese, Chia-Liang Liu, Dhruv S Kazi

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current cardiology reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Price determinants and pricing policies concerning potentially innovative health technologies: a scoping review.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026
    Article
  3. Plasma proteomics improves prediction of coronary plaque progression.European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Literature Review on Health Emigration in Rare Diseases-A Machine Learning Perspective.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Merilyn S VargheseRichard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research in Cardiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 375 Longwood Ave, 4th Floor, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Chia-Liang LiuRichard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research in Cardiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 375 Longwood Ave, 4th Floor, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Dhruv S KaziRichard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research in Cardiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 375 Longwood Ave, 4th Floor, Boston, MA, 02215, USA. dkazi@bidmc.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9510-2979
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · US

Funding

JUSTice-Involved Individuals Cardiovascular Disease Epidemiology (JUSTICE)R01HL137696 · NHLBI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, EMILY AI-HUA · 2018 to 2022
$4.2M
Familial hypercholesterolemia screening in children: population impact of phenotype, genotype, and cascade approachesR01HL141823 · NHLBI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI DE FERRANTI, SARAH D, MORAN, ANDREW EDWARD · 2019 to 2022
$3.3M
A Multi-Dimensional Linked Registry to Identify Biological, Clinical, Health System, and Socioeconomic Risk Factors for COVID-19-Related Cardiovascular EventsR01HL157530 · NHLBI · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI GERSZTEN, ROBERT E, KAZI, DHRUV SATISH · 2021 to 2024
$3.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL137696NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL141823NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL157530
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe launch of new effective and safe cardiovascular drugs has produced large gains in health outcomes for several cardiovascular conditions. But this innovation comes at the cost of rapidly increasing pharmaceutical spending and high out-of-pocket costs. RECENT

findingsIn the USA, manufacturers are able to set prices according to what the market will bear rather than value to patients or society, with a complicated system of discounts and rebates obscuring the final price borne by payors. Some of these costs are passed on to patients in the form of co-payments or co-insurance, making these effective but high-cost medications unaffordable for many patients. Orphan drugs developed to treat rare diseases-for which manufactures are presented substantial financial and regulatory benefits-are particularly problematic, as they typically enter the market at very high prices compared with drugs for other indications. Systematic cost-effectiveness analyses from the healthcare sector or societal perspectives can help identify the value-based price of a medication at market entry as well as later in the lifecycle of the drug when more data on effectiveness and safety becomes available. Despite bipartisan support, legislative progress on drug pricing has been slow. Clinicians should know the cost of the drugs they prescribe frequently, use generics where feasible, and regularly discuss out-of-pocket costs with patients to pre-empt cost-related non-adherence.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular AgentsCost-Benefit AnalysisDrug CostsHumansCardiovascular AgentsAdherenceCardiovascularCost-effectivenessDrug pricingOrphan drugsOut-of-pocket costs

Identifiers

PMID34599393
PMCPMC8486158
OpenAlexW3204949767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.