Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34599274›Full record

ArticleLaboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology2022

Deep convolutional neural network-based algorithm for muscle biopsy diagnosis.

Yoshinori Kabeya, Mariko Okubo, Sho Yonezawa, Hiroki Nakano, Michio Inoue, Masashi Ogasawara, Yoshihiko Saito, Jantima Tanboon, Luh Ari Indrawati, Theerawat Kumutpongpanich and 9 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Yoshinori KabeyaIBM Japan Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
Mariko OkuboDepartment of Neuromuscular Research, National Institute of Neuroscience, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo, Japan.
Sho YonezawaIBM Japan Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroki NakanoIBM Japan Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
Michio InoueDepartment of Neuromuscular Research, National Institute of Neuroscience, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo, Japan.
Masashi OgasawaraDepartment of Neuromuscular Research, National Institute of Neuroscience, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshihiko SaitoDepartment of Neuromuscular Research, National Institute of Neuroscience, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1643-4797
Jantima TanboonDepartment of Neuromuscular Research, National Institute of Neuroscience, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo, Japan.
Luh Ari IndrawatiDepartment of Neuromuscular Research, National Institute of Neuroscience, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo, Japan.
Theerawat KumutpongpanichDepartment of Neuromuscular Research, National Institute of Neuroscience, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo, Japan.
Yen-Lin ChenDepartment of Neuromuscular Research, National Institute of Neuroscience, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo, Japan.
Wakako YoshiokaDepartment of Neuromuscular Research, National Institute of Neuroscience, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo, Japan.
Shinichiro HayashiDepartment of Neuromuscular Research, National Institute of Neuroscience, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo, Japan.
Toshiya IwamoriIBM Japan Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
Yusuke TakeuchiWatson Health, IBM Corporation, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Reitaro TokumasuIBM Japan Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
Atsushi TakanoIBM Japan Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
Fumihiko MatsudaCenter for Genomic Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Ichizo NishinoDepartment of Neuromuscular Research, National Institute of Neuroscience, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo, Japan. nishino@ncnp.go.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9452-112X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Histopathologic evaluation of muscle biopsy samples is essential for classifying and diagnosing muscle diseases. However, the numbers of experienced specialists and pathologists are limited. Although new technologies such as artificial intelligence are expected to improve medical reach, their use with rare diseases, such as muscle diseases, is challenging because of the limited availability of training datasets. To address this gap, we developed an algorithm based on deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and collected 4041 microscopic images of 1400 hematoxylin-and-eosin-stained pathology slides stored in the National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry for training CNNs. Our trained algorithm differentiated idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (mostly treatable) from hereditary muscle diseases (mostly non-treatable) with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.996 and achieved better sensitivity and specificity than the diagnoses done by nine physicians under limited diseases and conditions. Furthermore, it successfully and accurately classified four subtypes of the idiopathic inflammatory myopathies with an average AUC of 0.958 and classified seven subtypes of hereditary muscle disease with an average AUC of 0.936. We also established a method to validate the similarity between the predictions made by the algorithm and the seven physicians using visualization technology and clarified the validity of the predictions. These results support the reliability of the algorithm and suggest that our algorithm has the potential to be used straightforwardly in a clinical setting.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDeep LearningNeural Networks, ComputerAnimalsBiopsyDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansMusclesMuscular DiseasesMyositisReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.