Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34599265›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Radiologists can visually predict mortality risk based on the gestalt of chest radiographs comparable to a deep learning network.

Jakob Weiss, Jana Taron, Zexi Jin, Thomas Mayrhofer, Hugo J W L Aerts, Michael T Lu, Udo Hoffmann

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jakob Weiss *Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (AIM) Program, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Harvard Institutes of Medicine (HIM), Suite 343, 77 Avenue Louis Pasteur, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. jakob_weiss@dfci.harvard.edu.
Jana Taron *Cardiovascular Imaging Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charles River Plaza, 165 Cambridge Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Zexi JinCardiovascular Imaging Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charles River Plaza, 165 Cambridge Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Thomas MayrhoferCardiovascular Imaging Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charles River Plaza, 165 Cambridge Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Hugo J W L AertsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (AIM) Program, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Harvard Institutes of Medicine (HIM), Suite 343, 77 Avenue Louis Pasteur, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Michael T LuArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (AIM) Program, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Harvard Institutes of Medicine (HIM), Suite 343, 77 Avenue Louis Pasteur, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Udo HoffmannArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (AIM) Program, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Harvard Institutes of Medicine (HIM), Suite 343, 77 Avenue Louis Pasteur, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning convolutional neural network (CNN) can predict mortality from chest radiographs, yet, it is unknown whether radiologists can perform the same task. Here, we investigate whether radiologists can visually assess image gestalt (defined as deviation from an unremarkable chest radiograph associated with the likelihood of 6-year mortality) of a chest radiograph to predict 6-year mortality. The assessment was validated in an independent testing dataset and compared to the performance of a CNN developed for mortality prediction. Results are reported for the testing dataset only (n = 100; age 62.5 ± 5.2; male 55%, event rate 50%). The probability of 6-year mortality based on image gestalt had high accuracy (AUC: 0.68 (95% CI 0.58-0.78), similar to that of the CNN (AUC: 0.67 (95% CI 0.57-0.77); p = 0.90). Patients with high/very high image gestalt ratings were significantly more likely to die when compared to those rated as very low (p ≤ 0.04). Assignment to risk categories was not explained by patient characteristics or traditional risk factors and imaging findings (p ≥ 0.2). In conclusion, assessing image gestalt on chest radiographs by radiologists renders high prognostic accuracy for the probability of mortality, similar to that of a specifically trained CNN. Further studies are warranted to confirm this concept and to determine potential clinical benefits.

Indexed as

MortalityRadiography, ThoracicRadiologistsAgedDeep LearningFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeural Networks, ComputerRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSmokers

Identifiers

PMID34599265
PMCPMC8486799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.