Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34599256›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Using fecal immunochemical tubes for the analysis of the gut microbiome has the potential to improve colorectal cancer screening.

Kertu Liis Krigul, Oliver Aasmets, Kreete Lüll, Tõnis Org, Elin Org

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Characteristics of gut microbiota in high-methylated colorectal cancer.International journal of clinical oncology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Emerging Tests for Noninvasive Colorectal Cancer Screening.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kertu Liis KrigulInstitute of Genomics, Estonian Genome Centre, University of Tartu, 51010, Tartu, Estonia.
Oliver AasmetsInstitute of Genomics, Estonian Genome Centre, University of Tartu, 51010, Tartu, Estonia.
Kreete LüllInstitute of Genomics, Estonian Genome Centre, University of Tartu, 51010, Tartu, Estonia.
Tõnis OrgInstitute of Genomics, Estonian Genome Centre, University of Tartu, 51010, Tartu, Estonia.
Elin OrgInstitute of Genomics, Estonian Genome Centre, University of Tartu, 51010, Tartu, Estonia. elin.org@ut.ee.
University of Tartu · EE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a challenging public health problem which successful treatment depends on the stage at diagnosis. Recently, CRC-specific microbiome signatures have been proposed as a marker for CRC detection. Since many countries have initiated CRC screening programs, it would be useful to analyze the microbiome in the samples collected in fecal immunochemical test (FIT) tubes for fecal occult blood testing. Therefore, we investigated the impact of FIT tubes and stabilization buffer on the microbial community structure evaluated in stool samples from 30 volunteers and compared the detected communities to those of fresh-frozen samples, highlighting previously published cancer-specific communities. Altogether, 214 samples were analyzed by 16S rRNA gene sequencing, including positive and negative controls. Our results indicated that the variation between individuals was greater than the differences introduced by the collection strategy. The vast majority of the genera were stable for up to 7 days. None of the changes observed between fresh-frozen samples and FIT tube specimens were related to previously identified CRC-specific bacteria. Overall, we show that FIT tubes can be used for profiling the microbiota in CRC screening programs. This circumvents the need to collect additional samples and can possibly improve the sensitivity of CRC detection.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeAdultAgedBacteriaColorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerEstoniaFecesFemaleFreezingHumansImmunologic TechniquesMaleMiddle AgedOccult BloodRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID34599256
PMCPMC8486803
OpenAlexW3203019764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.