ReviewNPJ Regenerative medicine2021
Tendon and multiomics: advantages, advances, and opportunities.
Review in NPJ Regenerative medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Proteomic biomarkers in rotator cuff disease: Current evidence and translational implications from a systematic review and network analysis.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2026Review
- Tendon healing in the era of regenerative medicine: literature review.Annals of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Achilles tendinopathy.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025Review
- Multi-omics insights into bone tissue injury and healing: bridging orthopedic trauma and regenerative medicine.Burns & trauma · 2025Review
- Tendon mechanobiology in the context of tendon biofabrication.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Transcriptome-Optimized Hydrogel Design of a Stem Cell Niche for Enhanced Tendon Regeneration.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025Article
- Recombinant lysyl oxidase effects on embryonic tendon cell phenotype and behavior.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2023Article
- Establishing in vivo and ex vivo chick embryo models to investigate fetal tendon healing.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Single-cell RNA sequencing in orthopedic research.Bone research · 2023Review
- Morphological and Physiological Aspects of Mutable Collagenous Tissue at the Autotomy Plane of the StarfishMarine drugs · 2023Review
- Creating an Optimal In Vivo Environment to Enhance Outcomes Using Cell Therapy to Repair/Regenerate Injured Tissues of the Musculoskeletal System.Biomedicines · 2022Review
- Tendon mechanical properties are enhancedFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
- Effect of a Functional Phospholipid Metabolome-Protein Association Pathway on the Mechanism of COVID-19 Disease Progression.International journal of biological sciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tendons heal by fibrosis, which hinders function and increases re-injury risk. Yet the biology that leads to degeneration and regeneration of tendons is not completely understood. Improved understanding of the metabolic nuances that cause diverse outcomes in tendinopathies is required to solve these problems. 'Omics methods are increasingly used to characterize phenotypes in tissues. Multiomics integrates 'omic datasets to identify coherent relationships and provide insight into differences in molecular and metabolic pathways between anatomic locations, and disease stages. This work reviews the current literature pertaining to multiomics in tendon and the potential of these platforms to improve tendon regeneration. We assessed the literature and identified areas where 'omics platforms contribute to the field: (1) Tendon biology where their hierarchical complexity and demographic factors are studied. (2) Tendon degeneration and healing, where comparisons across tendon pathologies are analyzed. (3) The in vitro engineered tendon phenotype, where we compare the engineered phenotype to relevant native tissues. (4) Finally, we review regenerative and therapeutic approaches. We identified gaps in current knowledge and opportunities for future study: (1) The need to increase the diversity of human subjects and cell sources. (2) Opportunities to improve understanding of tendon heterogeneity. (3) The need to use these improvements to inform new engineered and regenerative therapeutic approaches. (4) The need to increase understanding of the development of tendon pathology. Together, the expanding use of various 'omics platforms and data analysis resulting from these platforms could substantially contribute to major advances in the tendon tissue engineering and regenerative medicine field.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.