ArticleNature communications2021
How social relationships shape moral wrongness judgments.
Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.
- Failing Others' Expectations: Negative Emotions and Behavior Change in Daily Life.Affective science · 2026Article
- Article
- Infants use helping to infer the existence and strength of caring relationships.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Article
- Expectations of Reciprocal Generosity Are Specific to Equal Relationships.Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2026Article
- Collaborative Dishonesty: Children Are More Likely to Cheat When They Benefit Together.Developmental science · 2025Article
- Do Social Relationships Influence Moral Judgment? A Cross-Cultural Examination.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Perceived Stress and Society-Wide Moral Judgment.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2025Article
- A large-scale investigation of everyday moral dilemmas.PNAS nexus · 2025Article
- The need for an empirical research program regarding human-AI relational norms.AI and ethics · 2025Article
- Gratitude Is Morally Sensitive.Personality & social psychology bulletin · 2024Article
- The psychological, computational, and neural foundations of indebtedness.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Does it matter who harmed whom? A cross-cultural study of moral judgments about harm by and to insiders and outsiders.Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Contrasting two models of utilitarian reasoning.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Age-dependent changes in intuitive and deliberative cooperation.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Interpersonal relationships modulate subjective ratings and electrophysiological responses of moral evaluations.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2023Article
- Children's Reasoning About Empathy and Social Relationships.Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2023Article
- Editorial: Appraisal processes in moral judgment: resolving moral issues through cognition and emotion.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Judgments of whether an action is morally wrong depend on who is involved and the nature of their relationship. But how, when, and why social relationships shape moral judgments is not well understood. We provide evidence to address these questions, measuring cooperative expectations and moral wrongness judgments in the context of common social relationships such as romantic partners, housemates, and siblings. In a pre-registered study of 423 U.S. participants nationally representative for age, race, and gender, we show that people normatively expect different relationships to serve cooperative functions of care, hierarchy, reciprocity, and mating to varying degrees. In a second pre-registered study of 1,320 U.S. participants, these relationship-specific cooperative expectations (i.e., relational norms) enable highly precise out-of-sample predictions about the perceived moral wrongness of actions in the context of particular relationships. In this work, we show that this 'relational norms' model better predicts patterns of moral wrongness judgments across relationships than alternative models based on genetic relatedness, social closeness, or interdependence, demonstrating how the perceived morality of actions depends not only on the actions themselves, but also on the relational context in which those actions occur.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.