Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34598986›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Barriers and facilitators to accessing tuberculosis care in Nepal: a qualitative study to inform the design of a socioeconomic support intervention.

Kritika Dixit, Olivia Biermann, Bhola Rai, Tara Prasad Aryal, Gokul Mishra, Noemia Teixeira de Siqueira-Filha, Puskar Raj Paudel, Ram Narayan Pandit, Manoj Kumar Sah, Govinda Majhi and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Kritika DixitDepartment of Research, Birat Nepal Medical Trust (BNMT), Kathmandu, Nepal.ORCID 0000-0002-7957-8109
Olivia BiermannDepartment of Global Public Health, WHO Collaborating Centre on Tuberculosis and Social Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-5978-0211
Bhola RaiDepartment of Research, Birat Nepal Medical Trust (BNMT), Kathmandu, Nepal.
Tara Prasad AryalDepartment of Research, Birat Nepal Medical Trust (BNMT), Kathmandu, Nepal.
Gokul MishraDepartment of Research, Birat Nepal Medical Trust (BNMT), Kathmandu, Nepal.
Noemia Teixeira de Siqueira-FilhaDepartments of Clinical Sciences and International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0730-8561
Puskar Raj PaudelDepartment of Research, Birat Nepal Medical Trust (BNMT), Kathmandu, Nepal.
Ram Narayan PanditDepartment of Research, Birat Nepal Medical Trust (BNMT), Kathmandu, Nepal.
Manoj Kumar SahDepartment of Research, Birat Nepal Medical Trust (BNMT), Kathmandu, Nepal.
Govinda MajhiDepartment of Research, Birat Nepal Medical Trust (BNMT), Kathmandu, Nepal.
Jens LevyKNCV Tuberculosis Foundation, Den Haag, The Netherlands.
Job van RestKNCV Tuberculosis Foundation, Den Haag, The Netherlands.
Suman Chandra GurungDepartment of Research, Birat Nepal Medical Trust (BNMT), Kathmandu, Nepal.
Raghu DhitalDepartment of Research, Birat Nepal Medical Trust (BNMT), Kathmandu, Nepal.
Knut LönnrothDepartment of Global Public Health, WHO Collaborating Centre on Tuberculosis and Social Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
S Bertel SquireDepartments of Clinical Sciences and International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Maxine CawsDepartment of Research, Birat Nepal Medical Trust (BNMT), Kathmandu, Nepal.
Kristi SidneyDepartment of Global Public Health, WHO Collaborating Centre on Tuberculosis and Social Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Tom WingfieldDepartment of Global Public Health, WHO Collaborating Centre on Tuberculosis and Social Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden tom.wingfield@lstmed.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-8433-6887

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/V004832/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePsychosocial and economic (socioeconomic) barriers, including poverty, stigma and catastrophic costs, impede access to tuberculosis (TB) services in low-income countries. We aimed to characterise the socioeconomic barriers and facilitators of accessing TB services in Nepal to inform the design of a locally appropriate socioeconomic support intervention for TB-affected households.

designFrom August 2018 to July 2019, we conducted an exploratory qualitative study consisting of semistructured focus group discussions (FGDs) with purposively selected multisectoral stakeholders. The data were managed in NVivo V.12, coded by consensus and analysed thematically.

settingThe study was conducted in four districts, Makwanpur, Chitwan, Dhanusha and Mahottari, which have a high prevalence of poverty and TB.

participantsSeven FGDs were conducted with 54 in-country stakeholders, grouped by stakeholders, including people with TB (n=21), community stakeholders (n=13) and multidisciplinary TB healthcare professionals (n=20) from the National TB Programme.

resultsThe perceived socioeconomic barriers to accessing TB services were: inadequate TB knowledge and advocacy; high food and transportation costs; income loss and stigma. The perceived facilitators to accessing TB care and services were: enhanced championing and awareness-raising about TB and TB services; social protection including health insurance; cash, vouchers and/or nutritional allowance to cover food and travel costs; and psychosocial support and counselling integrated with existing adherence counselling from the National TB Programme.

conclusionThese results suggest that support interventions that integrate TB education, psychosocial counselling and expand on existing cash transfer schemes would be locally appropriate and could address the socioeconomic barriers to accessing and engaging with TB services faced by TB-affected households in Nepal. The findings have been used to inform the design of a socioeconomic support intervention for TB-affected households. The acceptability, feasibility and impact of this intervention on TB-related costs, stigma and TB treatment outcomes, is now being evaluated in a pilot implementation study in Nepal.

Indexed as

TuberculosisHumansIncomeNepalPovertyQualitative Researchpublic healthqualitative researchtuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID34598986
PMCPMC8488704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.