Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34598981›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Evaluation of an interactive web-based programme on relapse management for people with multiple sclerosis (POWER@MS2): study protocol for a process evaluation accompanying a randomised controlled trial.

Lisa Wenzel, Christoph Heesen, Jutta Scheiderbauer, Markus van de Loo, Sascha Köpke, Anne Christin Rahn

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04233970 (Development and Evaluation of an Interactive Web-based Programme on Relapse Management for People With Multiple Sclerosis - a Randomized Controlled Trial With Mixed Methods Process Evaluation), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04233970 nacompletednot on this map

Development and Evaluation of an Interactive Web-based Programme on Relapse Management for People With Multiple Sclerosis - a Randomized Controlled Trial With Mixed Methods Process Evaluation

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversitätsklinikum Hamburg-EppendorfRan2020 to 2023Enrolled160ConditionsMultiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingArmsweb-based intervention programme, web-based information material offered via the same platform (broca®) in addition to usual care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lisa WenzelInstitute of Nursing Science, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany l.wenzel.ext@uke.de.ORCID 0000-0002-4862-6008
Christoph HeesenInstitute of Neuroimmunology and Multiple Sclerosis (INIMS), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Jutta ScheiderbauerStiftung für Selbstbestimmung und Selbstvertretung von MS-Betroffenen, Trier, Germany.
Markus van de LooGerman Multiple Sclerosis Self-help Society, Federal Association, Hannover, Germany.
Sascha KöpkeInstitute of Nursing Science, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Anne Christin RahnInstitute of Neuroimmunology and Multiple Sclerosis (INIMS), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Universität Hamburg · DEUniversity of Cologne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionProcess evaluations accompanying complex interventions examine the implementation process of the underlying intervention, identify mechanisms of impact and assess contextual factors. This paper presents the protocol for a process evaluation conducted alongside the randomised controlled trial POWER@MS2. The trial comprises the evaluation of a web-based complex intervention on relapse management in 188 people with multiple sclerosis conducted in 20 centres. The web-based intervention programme focuses on relapse treatment decision making and includes a decision aid, a nurse-led webinar and an online chat. With the process evaluation presented here, we aim to assess participants' responses to and interactions with the intervention to understand how and why the intervention produces change. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A mixed methods design is used to explore the acceptance of the intervention as well as its use and impact on participants. Participants are people with multiple sclerosis, neurologists, nurses and stakeholders. Quantitative semistandardised evaluation forms will be collected throughout the study. Qualitative semistructured telephone interviews will be conducted at the end of the study with selected participants, especially people with multiple sclerosis and neurologists. Quantitative data will be collected and analysed descriptively. Based on the results, the qualitative interviews will be conducted and analysed thematically, and the results will be merged in a joint display table. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The process evaluation has received ethical approval from the Ethical Committee of the University of Lübeck (reference 19-024). Findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals, at conferences, meetings and on relevant patient websites. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04233970.

Indexed as

Internet-Based InterventionMultiple SclerosisChronic DiseaseHumansProcess Assessment, Health CareRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRecurrencemedical education & trainingmultiple sclerosisworld wide web technology

Identifiers

PMID34598981
PMCPMC8488740
OpenAlexW3203277524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.