ArticleAcademic radiology2022
A Cascaded Deep Learning-Based Artificial Intelligence Algorithm for Automated Lesion Detection and Classification on Biparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Article in Academic radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
48 citing papers in PubMed.
- A comprehensive framework for multi-class prostate cancer classification using biparametric MRI: a multi-center retrospective study.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- Deep learning in enhanced CT imaging: predicting invasion depth of rectal adenocarcinoma.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- MSTM-Net: a two-stage prostate cancer segmentation network based on swin-transformer-mamba architecture.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Assessing inter-observer variability in prostate and GTV segmentation on mpMRI: A comparison between radiation oncologists and AI-based method.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- Development and Validation of a Multimodal AI-Based Model for Predicting Post-Prostatectomy Treatment Outcomes from Baseline Biparametric Prostate MRI.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Prostate MRI: Addressing Current Limitations Through Emerging Technologies.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2026Review
- Application and prospect of artificial intelligence in diagnostic imaging of prostate cancer.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Review
- External evaluation of an open-source deep learning model for prostate cancer detection on bi-parametric MRI.European radiology · 2026Article
- AI-assisted image analysis ofBioinformation · 2026Article
- Multiparametric MRI-based radiomics model integrating tumor lesion and periprostatic adipose tissue for predicting bone metastasis in prostate cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Research-based clinical deployment of artificial intelligence algorithm for prostate MRI.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Article
- AI in Prostate MRI: A Task-Based Review.Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology · 2025Review
- A multimodal automated deep learning-based model for predicting biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer following prostatectomy from baseline MRI, Presurgical clinical covariates.Clinical imaging · 2025Article
- Toward a Refined PI-RADS: The Feasibility and Limitations of More Informative Metrics in Reviewing MRI Scans.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025Review
- Prostate Cancer Risk Stratification and Scan Tailoring Using Deep Learning on Abbreviated Prostate MRI.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in prostate cancer.Chinese medical journal · 2025Review
- Impact of AI-Generated ADC Maps on Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: A Feasibility Study.Academic radiology · 2025Article
- The future of multimodal artificial intelligence models for integrating imaging and clinical metadata: a narrative reviewDiagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2025Review
- Evaluating deep learning and radiologist performance in volumetric prostate cancer analysis with biparametric MRI and histopathologically mapped slides.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Article
- Toward diffusion MRI in the diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic cancer.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
RATIONALE AND
objectivesProstate MRI improves detection of clinically significant prostate cancer; however, its diagnostic performance has wide variation. Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to assist radiologists in the detection and classification of prostatic lesions. Herein, we aimed to develop and test a cascaded deep learning detection and classification system trained on biparametric prostate MRI using PI-RADS for assisting radiologists during prostate MRI read out. MATERIALS AND
methodsT2-weighted, diffusion-weighted (ADC maps, high b value DWI) MRI scans obtained at 3 Tesla from two institutions (n = 1043 in-house and n = 347 Prostate-X, respectively) acquired between 2015 to 2019 were used for model training, validation, testing. All scans were retrospectively reevaluated by one radiologist. Suspicious lesions were contoured and assigned a PI-RADS category. A 3D U-Net-based deep neural network was used to train an algorithm for automated detection and segmentation of prostate MRI lesions. Two 3D residual neural network were used for a 4-class classification task to predict PI-RADS categories 2 to 5 and BPH. Training and validation used 89% (n = 1290 scans) of the data using 5 fold cross-validation, the remaining 11% (n = 150 scans) were used for independent testing. Algorithm performance at lesion level was assessed using sensitivities, positive predictive values (PPV), false discovery rates (FDR), classification accuracy, Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). Additional analysis was conducted to compare AI algorithm's lesion detection performance with targeted biopsy results.
resultsMedian age was 66 years (IQR = 60-71), PSA 6.7 ng/ml (IQR = 4.7-9.9) from in-house cohort. In the independent test set, algorithm correctly detected 111 of 198 lesions leading to 56.1% (49.3%-62.6%) sensitivity. PPV was 62.7% (95% CI 54.7%-70.7%) with FDR of 37.3% (95% CI 29.3%-45.3%). Of 79 true positive lesions, 82.3% were tumor positive at targeted biopsy, whereas of 57 false negative lesions, 50.9% were benign at targeted biopsy. Median DSC for lesion segmentation was 0.359. Overall PI-RADS classification accuracy was 30.8% (95% CI 24.6%-37.8%).
conclusionOur cascaded U-Net, residual network architecture can detect, classify cancer suspicious lesions at prostate MRI with good detection, reasonable classification performance metrics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.