Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34598684›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2021

Social norms, attitudes and access to modern contraception for adolescent girls in six districts in Uganda.

Paul Bukuluki, Peter Kisaakye, Maxime Houinato, Adekemi Ndieli, Evelyn Letiyo, Dan Bazira

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paul BukulukiSchool of Social Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda. pbukuluki@gmail.com.
Peter KisaakyeSchool of Statistics and Planning, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Maxime HouinatoUN Women, Kampala, Uganda.
Adekemi NdieliUN Women, Kampala, Uganda.
Evelyn LetiyoUN Women, Kampala, Uganda.
Dan BaziraUN Women, Kampala, Uganda.
Makerere University · UG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSocial norms continue to be entrenched in Uganda. Understanding social norms helps to uncover the underlying drivers that influence attitudes and behavior towards contraceptive access and use. This study therefore seeks to investigate the factors that influence the social norm - access to contraception by adolescent girls - in six districts in Uganda. DATA AND

methodsUsing data from a community cross-sectional survey in six districts (Amudat, Kaberamaido, Kasese, Moroto, Tororo and Pader) in Uganda, a binary logistic regression model was fitted to examine the variation in individual beliefs and socio-economic and demographic factors on 'allowing adolescent girls to access contraception in a community' - we refer to as a social norm.

resultsResults demonstrate that a higher proportion of respondents hold social norms that inhibit adolescent girls from accessing contraception in the community. After controlling for all variables, the likelihood for adolescent girls to be allowed access to contraception in the community was higher among respondents living in Kaberamaido (OR = 2.58; 95 %CI = 1.23-5.39), Kasese (OR = 2.62; 95 %CI = 1.25-5.47), Pader (OR = 4.35; 95 %CI = 2.15-8.79) and Tororo (OR = 9.44; 95 %CI = 4.59-19.37), those aged 30-34 years likely (OR = 1.73; 95 %CI = 1.03-2.91). However, the likelihood for respondents living in Moroto to agree that adolescent girls are allowed to access contraception was lower (OR = 0.27; 95 %CI = 0.11-0.68) compared to respondents living in Amudat. Respondents who were not formally employed (OR = 0.63; 95 %CI = 0.43-0.91), and those who agreed that withdrawal prevents pregnancy (OR = 0.45; 95 %CI = 0.35-0.57) were less likely to agree that adolescent girls are allowed to access contraception in the community. Respondents who agreed that a girl who is sexually active can use contraception to prevent unwanted pregnancy (OR = 1.84; 95 %CI = 1.33-2.53), unmarried women or girls should have access to contraception (OR = 2.15; 95 %CI = 1.61-2.88), married women or girls should have access to contraception (OR = 1.55; 95 %CI = 0.99-2.39) and women know where to obtain contraception for prevention against pregnancy (OR = 2.35; 95 %CI = 1.19-4.65) were more likely to agree that adolescent girls are allowed to access contraception.

conclusionsThe findings underscore the need for context specific ASRH programs that take into account the differences in attitudes and social norms that affect access and use of contraception by adolescents.

Indexed as

ContraceptionSocial NormsAdolescentAttitudeContraception BehaviorCross-Sectional StudiesFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansPregnancyUgandaAccess and Use of ContraceptionAdolescentsAttitudesSocial normsUganda

Identifiers

PMID34598684
PMCPMC8487130
OpenAlexW3202165147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.