ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2021
Visually guided preprocessing of bioanalytical laboratory data using an interactive R notebook (pguIMP).
Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A model-agnostic framework for dataset-specific selection of missing value imputation methods in pain-related numerical data.Canadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur · 2026Article
- Targeted lipidomics dataset of central nervous system and plasma from mice with experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis.Data in brief · 2025Article
- Cyclical hybrid imputation technique for missing values in data sets.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Visually guided preprocessing of bioanalytical laboratory data using an interactive R notebook (pguIMP).CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2021Article
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning in pain research: a data scientometric analysis.Pain reportsReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The evaluation of pharmacological data using machine learning requires high data quality. Therefore, data preprocessing, that is, cleaning analytical laboratory errors, replacing missing values or outliers, and transforming data adequately before actual data analysis, is crucial. Because current tools available for this purpose often require programming skills, preprocessing tools with graphical user interfaces that can be used interactively are needed. In collaboration between data scientists and experts in bioanalytical diagnostics, a graphical software package for data preprocessing called pguIMP is proposed, which contains a fixed sequence of preprocessing steps to enable reproducible interactive data preprocessing. As an R-based package, it also allows direct integration into this data science environment without requiring any programming knowledge. The implementation of contemporary data processing methods, including machine-learning-based imputation techniques, ensures the generation of corrected and cleaned bioanalytical data sets that preserve data structures such as clusters better than is possible with classical methods. This was evaluated on bioanalytical data sets from lipidomics and drug research using k-nearest-neighbors-based imputation followed by k-means clustering and density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise. The R package provides a Shiny-based web interface designed to be easy to use for non-data analysis experts. It is demonstrated that the spectrum of methods provided is suitable as a standard pipeline for preprocessing bioanalytical data in biomedical research domains. The R package pguIMP is freely available at the comprehensive R archive network (https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/pguIMP/index.html).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.