ArticlePhysiological measurement2021
Detrusor overactivity assessment using ultrasound bladder vibrometry.
Article in Physiological measurement, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Phenotyping Overactive Bladder-Part 1: Are There Different Types of Urgency and Can They be Translated to Clinical, Urodynamic and Radiological Phenotyping? ICI-RS 2025.Neurourology and urodynamics · 2026Review
- Increased Detrusor Thickness and Reduced Uterocervical Angle as Novel Predictors of De Novo Urinary Incontinence in Pregnancy: A Prospective Cross-Sectional Study.International urogynecology journal · 2026Article
- New Imaging Techniques on the Horizon to Study Overactive and Neurogenic Bladder.Current bladder dysfunction reports · 2025Review
- Ultrasound Urodynamics: A Review of Ultrasound Imaging Techniques for Enhanced Bladder Functional Diagnostics.Current bladder dysfunction reports · 2024Review
- Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Depression: A Review.Health psychology research · 2023Article
- Paediatric urodynamic studies: emerging technologies and new frontiers.Therapeutic advances in urologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.