Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34598052›Full record

ArticleCognition2021

Oculomotor feedback rapidly reduces overt attentional capture.

Brian A Anderson, Lana Mrkonja

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Rethinking Distraction.Visual cognition · 2024
    Article
  7. Oculomotor suppression of abrupt onsets versus color singletons.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2023
    Article
  8. This is a test: Oculomotor capture when the experiment keeps score.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Brian A AndersonTexas A&M University, Department of Psychology, 4235 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843-4235, United States of America. Electronic address: brian.anderson@tamu.edu.
Lana MrkonjaTexas A&M University, Department of Psychology, 4235 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843-4235, United States of America.
Texas A&M University · US

Funding

The Control of Attention and Learning from Physical EffortR01DA046410 · NIDA · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY · PI ANDERSON, BRIAN AUGUST · 2019 to 2023
$1.9M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA046410
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

People often have limited awareness of the extent to which their attention is captured by salient-but-irrelevant stimuli. In the present study, we examined how providing feedback concerning the frequency of oculomotor capture by such stimuli modulates the control of attention. Our results show that the provision of oculomotor feedback produces a rapid and dramatic decrease in the frequency of distractor fixations. Further probing of this reduction in oculomotor capture by time to fixate the first stimulus revealed further insights into the nature of this experience-dependent effect. A higher frequency of relatively slow fixation latencies was observed in the feedback group, with such responses being generally less prone to capture, reflecting a speed-accuracy tradeoff. Fixations with slower latencies were also associated with a reduced frequency of oculomotor capture in the feedback group, whereas the fastest responses were almost exclusively stimulus-driven across participants and unaffected by feedback. These effects of feedback persisted when feedback was removed and they generalized to novel stimuli. Our findings suggest that, without any instruction concerning how to use the feedback, the oculomotor system defaults to delaying saccadic responses to allow more time for goal-directed influences on selection to come online, reflecting a history-dependent shift in oculomotor processing.

Indexed as

AttentionEye MovementsFeedbackHumansReaction TimeSaccadesAttentional captureEye movementsFeedbackSalienceSelective attention

Identifiers

PMID34598052
PMCPMC8511077
OpenAlexW3202323630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.