ArticleCancer2022
Identifying and describing cancer survivors: Implications for cancer survivorship research and clinical care.
Article in Cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Psychosocial interventions to improve quality of life in Hispanic cancer survivors: a meta-analysis.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Availability of cancer survivorship services for adolescents and young adults: Findings from the 2022 NCI Community Oncology Research Program Landscape Assessment.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Article
- Mapping advanced and metastatic cancer survivorship research in Australia: a systematic scoping review.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Review
- Impact of public vs. private insurance coverage on quality of life of women with early-stage estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2025Article
- Impact of Postdiagnosis Health Behaviors and Behavior Changes on Prognosis in Colorectal Cancer Patients: Evidence From Real-World Data.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- Combined effects of depression and sedentary behavior on mortality risk among older adults: a population-based cohort study.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- Team complexity and care coordination for cancer survivors with multiple chronic conditions: a mixed methods study.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2025Article
- Feasibility and initial assessment of a holistic neuropsychological day program for vocational rehabilitation following non-central nervous system cancer.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Neurologic dance training (NDT) as supportive care for the physical symptoms of cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Cancer survivorship research & care · 2025Article
- Association of patient-reported financial barriers with healthcare utilization among Medicare beneficiaries with a history of cancer.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2024Article
- Article
- Patient preferences and comfort for cancer survivorship models of care: results of an online survey.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2023Article
- The PhenX Toolkit: standard measurement resources for cancer outcomes and survivorship research.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2023Article
- Article
- Provision and delivery of survivorship care for adult patients with haematological malignancies: A scoping review protocol.PloS one · 2023Article
- Identifying and describing cancer survivors: Implications for cancer survivorship research and clinical care.Cancer · 2022Article
- Prediction of cancer survivors' mortality risk in Korea: a 25-year nationwide prospective cohort study.Epidemiology and health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGathering information directly from cancer survivors has advanced our understanding of the cancer survivorship experience. However, it is unknown whether surveys can distinguish important subgroups of cancer survivors. This study aimed to describe the current landscape of survey questions used to identify and describe cancer survivors in national cross-sectional studies.
methodsUsing publicly available databases, the authors identified national cross-sectional surveys used in the United States within the past 15 years that included a question on self-reported history of cancer. After abstracting questions and response items used to identify cancer survivors, they conducted a descriptive analysis.
resultsThe authors identified 14 national cross-sectional surveys, with half administered to the general population and the other half administered to cancer survivors. The most common question used to identify cancer survivors was "Have you ever been told by a doctor or other health professional that you had cancer?" Most surveys had questions asking participants to identify a single cancer type (n = 11), multiple prior cancer diagnoses or types (n = 11), and the time from diagnosis (n = 12). Treatment questions varied from active treatment status to specific treatments received. Questions addressing cancer stage (n = 2), subtypes (n = 1), metastatic status (n = 3), and recurrence (n = 4) were less frequently included.
conclusionsThere is no standard method for assessing self-reported cancer history, and this limits the ability to distinguish among potentially important subgroups of survivors. Future cross-sectional surveys that capture nuanced data elements, such as cancer types, stages/subtypes, metastatic/recurrent status, and treatments received, can help to fill important gaps in cancer survivorship research and clinical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.