Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34597324›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2021

Continuous positive airway pressure to reduce the risk of early peripheral oxygen desaturation after onset of apnoea in children: A double-blind randomised controlled trial.

Jayme Marques Dos Santos Neto, Clístenes Cristian de Carvalho, Lívia Barboza de Andrade, Thiago Gadelha Batista Dos Santos, Rebeca Gonelli Albanez da Cunha Andrade, Raphaella Amanda Maria Leite Fernandes, Flavia Augusta de Orange

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jayme Marques Dos Santos NetoSupport and Therapeutic Diagnosis Division, Anesthesiology and Post-Anesthetic Care Unit, Federal University of Pernambuco's Teaching Hospital, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6751-1134
Clístenes Cristian de CarvalhoDepartment of Post-graduation, Instituto de Medicina Integral Prof. Fernando Figueira, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6482-5453
Lívia Barboza de AndradeDepartment of Post-graduation, Instituto de Medicina Integral Prof. Fernando Figueira, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Thiago Gadelha Batista Dos SantosSupport and Therapeutic Diagnosis Division, Anesthesiology and Post-Anesthetic Care Unit, Federal University of Pernambuco's Teaching Hospital, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Rebeca Gonelli Albanez da Cunha AndradeDepartment of Post-graduation, Instituto de Medicina Integral Prof. Fernando Figueira, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Raphaella Amanda Maria Leite FernandesDepartment of Post-graduation, Instituto de Medicina Integral Prof. Fernando Figueira, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Flavia Augusta de OrangeSupport and Therapeutic Diagnosis Division, Anesthesiology and Post-Anesthetic Care Unit, Federal University of Pernambuco's Teaching Hospital, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Instituto de Medicina Integral Professor Fernando Figueira · BRUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco · BRUniversidade Federal de Campina Grande · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) during anaesthesia induction improves oxygen saturation (SpO2) outcomes in adults subjected to airway manipulation, and could similarly support oxygenation in children. We evaluated whether CPAP ventilation and passive CPAP oxygenation in children would defer a SpO2 decrease to 95% after apnoea onset compared to the regular technique in which no positive airway pressure is applied. In this double-blind, parallel, randomised controlled clinical trial, 68 children aged 2-6 years with ASA I-II who underwent surgery under general anaesthesia were divided into CPAP and control groups (n = 34 in each group). The intervention was CPAP ventilation and passive CPAP oxygenation using an anaesthesia workstation. The primary outcome was the elapsed time until SpO2 decreased to 95% during a follow-up period of 300 s from apnoea onset (T1). We also recorded the time required to regain baseline levels from an SpO2 of 95% aided by positive pressure ventilation (T2). The median T1 was 278 s (95% confidence interval [CI]: 188-368) in the CPAP group and 124 s (95% CI: 92-157) in the control group (median difference: 154 s; 95% CI: 58-249; p = 0.002). There were 17 (50%) and 32 (94.1%) primary events in the CPAP and control groups, respectively. The hazard ratio was 0.26 (95% CI: 0.14-0.48; p<0.001). The median for T2 was 21 s (95% CI: 13-29) and 29 s (95% CI: 22-36) in the CPAP and control groups, respectively (median difference: 8 s; 95% CI: -3 to 19; p = 0.142). SpO2 was significantly higher in the CPAP group than in the control group throughout the consecutive measures between 60 and 210 s (with p ranging from 0.047 to <0.001). Thus, in the age groups examined, CPAP ventilation and passive CPAP oxygenation deferred SpO2 decrease after apnoea onset compared to the regular technique with no positive airway pressure.

Indexed as

OxygenChildChild, PreschoolContinuous Positive Airway PressureDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleSleep Apnea, ObstructiveTreatment OutcomeOxygen

Identifiers

PMID34597324
PMCPMC8486132
OpenAlexW3201821558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.