Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34597294›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2021

Action planning and control under uncertainty emerge through a desirability-driven competition between parallel encoding motor plans.

Vince Enachescu, Paul Schrater, Stefan Schaal, Vassilios Christopoulos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Rapid Motor Inhibition as a Mechanism to Prevent Outdated Movements.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vince EnachescuDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6500-3948
Paul SchraterDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7853-8984
Stefan SchaalDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Vassilios ChristopoulosDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California Riverside, Riverside, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0541-8700

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Living in an uncertain world, nearly all of our decisions are made with some degree of uncertainty about the consequences of actions selected. Although a significant progress has been made in understanding how the sensorimotor system incorporates uncertainty into the decision-making process, the preponderance of studies focus on tasks in which selection and action are two separate processes. First people select among alternative options and then initiate an action to implement the choice. However, we often make decisions during ongoing actions in which the value and availability of the alternatives can change with time and previous actions. The current study aims to decipher how the brain deals with uncertainty in decisions that evolve while acting. To address this question, we trained individuals to perform rapid reaching movements towards two potential targets, where the true target location was revealed only after the movement initiation. We found that reaction time and initial approach direction are correlated, where initial movements towards intermediate locations have longer reaction times than movements that aim directly to the target locations. Interestingly, the association between reaction time and approach direction was independent of the target probability. By modeling the task within a recently proposed neurodynamical framework, we showed that action planning and control under uncertainty emerge through a desirability-driven competition between motor plans that are encoded in parallel.

Indexed as

UncertaintyAdultBrainComputational BiologyDecision MakingFemaleHumansMaleModels, BiologicalMovementPsychophysicsReaction TimeTask Performance and AnalysisYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID34597294
PMCPMC8513832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.