Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34597230›Full record

ArticleRadiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc2021

Mucin-producing Cystic Hepatobiliary Neoplasms: Updated Nomenclature and Clinical, Pathologic, and Imaging Features.

Matthew H Lee, Venkata S Katabathina, Meghan G Lubner, Hardik U Shah, Srinivasa R Prasad, Kristina A Matkowskyj, Perry J Pickhardt

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Classification of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew H LeeFrom the Department of Radiology, Naval Medical Center San Diego, 34800 Bob Wilson Dr, San Diego, CA 92134 (M.H.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Tex (V.S.K.); Departments of Radiology (M.G.L., P.J.P.) and Pathology (K.A.M.), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wis; Department of Radiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Ga (H.U.S.); and Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (S.R.P.).ORCID 0000-0001-8500-0306
Venkata S KatabathinaFrom the Department of Radiology, Naval Medical Center San Diego, 34800 Bob Wilson Dr, San Diego, CA 92134 (M.H.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Tex (V.S.K.); Departments of Radiology (M.G.L., P.J.P.) and Pathology (K.A.M.), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wis; Department of Radiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Ga (H.U.S.); and Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (S.R.P.).ORCID 0000-0002-7800-7312
Meghan G LubnerFrom the Department of Radiology, Naval Medical Center San Diego, 34800 Bob Wilson Dr, San Diego, CA 92134 (M.H.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Tex (V.S.K.); Departments of Radiology (M.G.L., P.J.P.) and Pathology (K.A.M.), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wis; Department of Radiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Ga (H.U.S.); and Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (S.R.P.).ORCID 0000-0003-3788-2871
Hardik U ShahFrom the Department of Radiology, Naval Medical Center San Diego, 34800 Bob Wilson Dr, San Diego, CA 92134 (M.H.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Tex (V.S.K.); Departments of Radiology (M.G.L., P.J.P.) and Pathology (K.A.M.), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wis; Department of Radiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Ga (H.U.S.); and Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (S.R.P.).
Srinivasa R PrasadFrom the Department of Radiology, Naval Medical Center San Diego, 34800 Bob Wilson Dr, San Diego, CA 92134 (M.H.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Tex (V.S.K.); Departments of Radiology (M.G.L., P.J.P.) and Pathology (K.A.M.), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wis; Department of Radiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Ga (H.U.S.); and Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (S.R.P.).ORCID 0000-0003-4594-2117
Kristina A MatkowskyjFrom the Department of Radiology, Naval Medical Center San Diego, 34800 Bob Wilson Dr, San Diego, CA 92134 (M.H.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Tex (V.S.K.); Departments of Radiology (M.G.L., P.J.P.) and Pathology (K.A.M.), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wis; Department of Radiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Ga (H.U.S.); and Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (S.R.P.).ORCID 0000-0001-5223-0834
Perry J PickhardtFrom the Department of Radiology, Naval Medical Center San Diego, 34800 Bob Wilson Dr, San Diego, CA 92134 (M.H.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Tex (V.S.K.); Departments of Radiology (M.G.L., P.J.P.) and Pathology (K.A.M.), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wis; Department of Radiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Ga (H.U.S.); and Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (S.R.P.).ORCID 0000-0002-5534-8202
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USEmory University · USNaval Medical Center San Diego · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cystic hepatobiliary neoplasms with mucin-producing epithelium-mucinous cystic neoplasm of the liver (MCN) and intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct (IPNB)-are rare and distinct entities that have unique clinical, pathologic, and imaging features. They are differentiated pathologically by the presence of subepithelial ovarian-like hypercellular stroma (OLS), which is the defining histopathologic feature of MCN. MCN is commonly a benign, large, solitary, symptomatic, multiloculated cystic mass without biliary communication that occurs in middle-aged women. On the other hand, IPNBs are a heterogeneous spectrum of tumors, which are commonly associated with invasive carcinoma, occur in older patients, and can be differentiated from MCN by communication with the biliary tree, intraductal masses, associated biliary ductal dilatation, and absent OLS. Understanding of these rare neoplasms has grown and evolved over time and continues to today, but uncertainty and controversy persist, related to the rarity of these tumors, relatively recent designation as separate entities, inherent clinicopathologic heterogeneity, overlapping imaging features, and the fact that many prior studies likely included MCN and cystic IPNB together as a single entity. Confusion regarding these neoplasms is evident by historical inconsistencies and nonstandardized nomenclature through the years. Awareness of these entities is important for the interpreting radiologist to suggest a particular diagnosis or generate a meaningful differential diagnosis in the appropriate setting, and is of particular significance as MCN and cystic IPNB have overlapping imaging features with other more common hepatobiliary cystic masses but have different management and prognosis.

Indexed as

Bile Duct NeoplasmsGastrointestinal NeoplasmsPancreatic NeoplasmsAgedDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMiddle AgedMucinsPrognosisMucins

Identifiers

PMID34597230
PMCPMC8493652
OpenAlexW3203001241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.