Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34596844›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2022

Computational Design of Structured and Functional Peptide Macrocycles.

Stephanie Berger, Parisa Hosseinzadeh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Stephanie BergerInstitute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Parisa HosseinzadehKnight Campus, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA. parisah@uoregon.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Structure-based computational design methods have been developed to create proteins in silico with diverse shapes and sizes that accurately fold in vitro, from 7-residue macrocycles to megadalton-scale self-assembling nanomaterials. Precise control over protein shape has further enabled design and optimization of functional therapeutic proteins, including agonists, antagonists, enzymes, and vaccines. Computational design of functional peptides of smaller size presents a persistent challenge, with few successful examples to date. Herein we describe validated general methods for computational design of peptides using the Rosetta molecular modeling suite and discuss outstanding challenges and future directions.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyModels, MolecularPeptides, CyclicProteinsPeptides, CyclicProteinsComputational designMacrocyclesPeptide designRosetta

Identifiers

PMID34596844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.