ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2021
Contaminant metal concentrations in three species of aquatic macrophytes from the Coeur d'Alene Lake basin, USA.
Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The Coeur d'Alene Lake basin in Northwestern USA has extensive contamination from legacy mining waste, which overlaps with aquatic macrophyte habitat. We examined concentrations of arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), copper (Cu), lead (Pb), and zinc (Zn) in three macrophytes: Elodea canadensis (submerged), Myriophyllum spicatum (submerged), and Sagittaria latifolia (emergent). We collected macrophyte tissues from five contaminated sites and one uncontaminated site. Tissue concentrations were compared to sediment quality guidelines to assess potential toxicity from metal(loid)s to macrophyte-associated biota. We used threshold and probable effect concentrations to screen for potential toxicity. For the submerged species, the highest site means ± SD (analyte mg/kg dry mass) were 96 ± 61 (As), 18 ± 1.7 (Cd), 24 ± 15 (Cu), 610 ± 392 (Pb), and 1425 ± 222 (Zn). For contaminated sites, the probable effect threshold was exceeded in 38% (As), 45% (Cd), 0% (Cu), 74% (Pb), and 67% (Zn) of submerged species concentrations. Metal concentrations in S. latifolia tubers were lower than the submerged species leaves and shoots. Tuber concentrations did not exceed the probable effect threshold for any metal. Spatial differences in concentrations were most distinct for the submerged species. Our work shows significant amounts of metals are accumulating in some macrophytes of the study area and that biota associated with this vegetation may experience toxicity based upon guideline exceedances. Additionally, managers of invasive plants (e.g., M. spicatum) should consider the ramifications of control efforts given the high metal content of some plants (e.g., disposal issue).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.