Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34596759›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2022

Ischemic preconditioning of the muscle reduces the metaboreflex response of the knee extensors.

Luca Angius, Benjamin Pageaux, Antonio Crisafulli, James Hopker, Samuele Maria Marcora

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Luca AngiusFaculty of Health and Life Sciences, Department of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. luca.angius@northumbria.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4606-4272
Benjamin PageauxÉcole de Kinésiologie et des Sciences de l'Activité Physique (EKSAP), Faculté de Médicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9302-5183
Antonio CrisafulliThe Department of Medical Sciences, Sports Physiology Laboratory, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1933-2841
James HopkerEndurance Research Group, School of Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Kent, Chatham Maritime, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4786-7037
Samuele Maria MarcoraEndurance Research Group, School of Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Kent, Chatham Maritime, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1570-7936
Medway School of Pharmacy · GBInstitut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal · CAUniversity of Cagliari · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study investigated the effect of ischemic preconditioning (IP) on metaboreflex activation following dynamic leg extension exercise in a group of healthy participants.

methodSeventeen healthy participants were recruited. IP and SHAM treatments (3 × 5 min cuff occlusion at 220 mmHg or 20 mmHg, respectively) were administered in a randomized order to the upper part of exercising leg's thigh only. Muscle pain intensity (MP) and pain pressure threshold (PPT) were monitored while administrating IP and SHAM treatments. After 3 min of leg extension exercise at 70% of the maximal workload, a post-exercise muscle ischemia (PEMI) was performed to monitor the discharge group III/IV muscle afferents via metaboreflex activation. Hemodynamics were continuously recorded. MP was monitored during exercise and PEMI.

resultsIP significantly reduced mean arterial pressure compared to SHAM during metaboreflex activation (mean ± SD, 109.52 ± 7.25 vs. 102.36 ± 7.89 mmHg) which was probably the consequence of a reduced end diastolic volume (mean ± SD, 113.09 ± 14.25 vs. 102.42 ± 9.38 ml). MP was significantly higher during the IP compared to SHAM treatment, while no significant differences in PPT were found. MP did not change during exercise, but it was significantly lower during the PEMI following IP (5.10 ± 1.29 vs. 4.00 ± 1.54).

conclusionOur study demonstrated that IP reduces hemodynamic response during metaboreflex activation, while no effect on MP and PPT were found. The reduction in hemodynamic response was likely the consequence of a blunted venous return.

Indexed as

Ischemic PreconditioningAdultEnergy MetabolismFemaleHealthy VolunteersHemodynamicsHumansKnee JointMaleMuscle, SkeletalMyalgiaPain MeasurementReflexAfferent feedbackExerciseIschemic preconditioningMetaboreflexPainPerformance

Identifiers

PMID34596759
PMCPMC8748374
OpenAlexW3204442767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.