ReviewDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2021
[Statement of the surgical working group upper gastrointestinal tract (CAOGI) and the quality committee of the German Society for General and Visceral Surgery (DGAV) on the modified minimum caseload requirements for esophagus resection].
Review in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Risky hospital plan-A survey of head physicians in NRW: dramatic effects in visceral surgery].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Endoscopic negative-pressure treatment : From management of complications to pre-emptive active reflux drainage in abdomino-thoracic esophageal resection-A new safety concept for esophageal surgery.Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- [Endoscopic negative pressure treatment : From management of complications to pre-emptive active reflux drainage in abdominothoracic esophageal resection-A new safety concept for esophageal surgery].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023Article
- [Minimum case volume regulations in surgery from the perspective of the specialist society (DGCH) : Balancing act between science, politics, treatment reality and a range of other aspects].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A positive association between the number of operations and postoperative hospital mortality, the so-called caseload-treatment result relation, has been confirmed many times in the literature; however, the definition of the underlying volumes is not uniform. The number of 26 resections/year/institution, which has now been established by the Federal Joint Committee as the future minimum caseload requirement, is discussed in this statement of the surgical working group upper gastrointestinal tract (CAOGI) and the quality committee of the German Society for General and Visceral Surgery (DGAV), taking the treatment situation in Germany and the current data situation into account.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34596705What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.