Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34596573›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2021

Sharing Government Health Data With the Private Sector: Community Attitudes Survey.

Annette Braunack-Mayer, Belinda Fabrianesi, Jackie Street, Pauline O'Shaughnessy, Stacy M Carter, Lina Engelen, Lucy Carolan, Rebecca Bosward, David Roder, Kylie Sproston

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Community views on the secondary use of general practice data: Findings from a mixed-methods study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Sharing administrative health data with private industry: A report on two citizens' juries.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Annette Braunack-MayerAustralian Centre for Health Engagement, Evidence and Values, School of Health and Society, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4427-0224
Belinda FabrianesiAustralian Centre for Health Engagement, Evidence and Values, School of Health and Society, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8134-7900
Jackie StreetAustralian Centre for Health Engagement, Evidence and Values, School of Health and Society, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1033-4341
Pauline O'ShaughnessySchool of Mathematics and Applied Statistics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4741-3326
Stacy M CarterAustralian Centre for Health Engagement, Evidence and Values, School of Health and Society, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2617-8694
Lina EngelenSchool of Health and Society, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1631-6328
Lucy CarolanAustralian Centre for Health Engagement, Evidence and Values, School of Health and Society, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8116-4036
Rebecca BoswardAustralian Centre for Health Engagement, Evidence and Values, School of Health and Society, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3368-0781
David RoderUniversity of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6442-4409
Kylie SprostonBellberry Limited, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5599-4303

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of government health data for secondary purposes, such as monitoring the quality of hospital services, researching the health needs of populations, and testing how well new treatments work, is increasing. This increase in the secondary uses of health data has led to increased interest in what the public thinks about data sharing, in particular, the possibilities of sharing with the private sector for research and development. Although international evidence demonstrates broad public support for the secondary use of health data, this support does not extend to sharing health data with the private sector. If governments intend to share health data with the private sector, knowing what the public thinks will be important. This paper reports a national survey to explore public attitudes in Australia toward sharing health data with private companies for research on and development of therapeutic drugs and medical devices.

objectiveThis study aims to explore public attitudes in Australia toward sharing government health data with the private sector.

methodsA web-based survey tool was developed to assess attitudes about sharing government health data with the private sector. A market research company was employed to administer the web-based survey in June 2019.

resultsThe survey was completed by 2537 individuals residing in Australia. Between 51.8% and 57.98% of all participants were willing to share their data, with slightly fewer in favor of sharing to improve health services (51.99%) and a slightly higher proportion in favor of sharing for research and development (57.98%). There was a preference for opt-in consent (53.44%) and broad support for placing conditions on sharing health information with private companies (62% to 91.99%). Wide variability was also observed in participants' views about the extent to which the private sector could be trusted and how well they would behave if entrusted with people's health information. In their qualitative responses, the participants noted concerns about private sector corporate interests, corruption, and profit making and expressed doubt about the Australian government's capacity to manage data sharing safely. The percentages presented are adjusted against the Australian population.

conclusionsThis nationally representative survey provides preliminary evidence that Australians are uncertain about sharing their health data with the private sector. Although just over half of all the respondents supported sharing health data with the private sector, there was also strong support for strict conditions on sharing data and for opt-in consent and significant concerns about how well the private sector would manage government health data. Addressing public concern about sharing government health data with the private sector will require more and better engagement to build community understanding about how agencies can collect, share, protect, and use their personal data.

Indexed as

AttitudePrivate SectorAustraliaGovernmentHumansSurveys and Questionnairesbig dataconsentdata linkagehealth datahealth information systemsprivate sectorpublic interestpublic opinionsocial licensetrust

Identifiers

PMID34596573
PMCPMC8520136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.