Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34596571›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2021

Assessing the Acceptability and Feasibility of a Web-Based Screening for Psychoactive Substance Users Among a French Sample of University Students and Workers: Mixed Methods Prospective Study.

Emmanuelle Anthoine, Julie Caillon, Xavier Deparis, Michel Blanche, Maxime Lebeaupin, Marc-Antoine Brochard, Jean-Luc Venisse, Leïla Moret

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Emmanuelle AnthoinePHU11 Public Health Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Nantes, Nantes, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0411-5289
Julie CaillonAddictions Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Nantes, Nantes, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0068-0339
Xavier Deparis *Service de Santé au Travail de la Région Nantaise, Nantes, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4673-5427
Michel BlancheService de Santé des Étudiants (SUMPPS), University of Nantes, Nantes, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0680-4942
Maxime LebeaupinPHU11 Public Health Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Nantes, Nantes, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7931-0831
Marc-Antoine BrochardPulsio Santé, Stimulab Company, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0209-9230
Jean-Luc VenissePulsio Santé, Stimulab Company, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0373-4689
Leïla MoretPHU11 Public Health Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Nantes, Nantes, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1285-6394

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly detection in the prevention of addictive behaviors remains a complex question in practice for most first-line health care workers (HCWs). Several prevention measures have successfully included a screening stage followed by a brief intervention in case of risk-related use or referral to an addiction center for problematic use. Whereas early detection is highly recommended by the World Health Organization, it is not usually performed in practice.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to assess the acceptability and feasibility of a web-based app, called Pulsio Santé, for health service users and first-line prevention HCW and to carry out an exhaustive process of early detection of psychoactive substance use behaviors.

methodsA mixed methods prospective study was conducted in 2 departments: HCWs from the regional occupational health department and from the university department of preventive medicine dedicated to students were invited to participate. Participants 18 years or older who had been seen in 2017 by a HCW from one of the departments were eligible. The study procedure comprised 5 phases: (1) inclusion of the participants after a face-to-face consultation with an HCW; (2) reception of a text message by participants on their smartphone or by email; (3) self-assessment by participants regarding their substance use with the Pulsio Santé app; (4) if participants agreed, transfer of the results to the HCW; and (5) if participants declined, a message to invite them to get in touch with their general practitioner should the assessment detect a risk. Several feasibility and acceptability criteria were assessed by an analysis of a focus group with the HCW that explored 4 themes (usefulness and advantages, problems and limitations, possible improvements, and finally, integration into routine practice).

resultsA total of 1474 people were asked to participate, with 42 HCWs being involved. The percentage of people who agreed to receive a text message or an email, which was considered as the first level of acceptability, was 79.17% (1167/1474). The percentage of participants who clicked on the self-assessment link, considered as the second level of acceptability, was 60.24% (703/1167). The percentage of participants who completed their self-evaluation entirely, which was considered as the first level of feasibility, was 76.24% (536/703). The percentage of participants who shared the results of their evaluation with the HCWs, considered as the second level of feasibility, was 79.48% (426/536). The qualitative study showed that there were obstacles on the side of HCWs in carrying out the recommended interventions for people at risk based on their online screening, such as previous training or adaptations in accordance with specific populations.

conclusionsQuantitative results showed good acceptability and feasibility of the Pulsio Santé app by users and HCWs. There is a need for further studies more directly focused on the limitations highlighted by the qualitative results.

Indexed as

addictionfeasibility studypreventive medicinescreening and brief interventionweb-based app

Identifiers

PMID34596571
PMCPMC8520132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.