ArticleJournal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA2021
Biomechanical comparisons of different diagonal screw designs in a novel embedded calcaneal slide plate.
Article in Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMedial displacement calcaneal osteotomy (MDCO) is frequently used for the surgical correction of flatfoot. This study aims to investigate the biomechanical effect of the different diagonal screw design on a novel-designed embedded calcaneal plate for MDCO using finite element analysis (FEA), mechanical test and digital image correlation (DIC) measurement.
methodsFour groups according to the varied implanted plate were set as control group (Group 1), non-diagonal screw (Group 2), one-diagonal screw (Group 3), and two-diagonal screws groups (Group 4). For FEA, A 450 N load was applied to on the anterior process of the calcaneus from top to bottom. Observational indices included the stress on the cortical and cancellous bone of the calcaneus surrounding the implant, the plate itself as well as screws, and the displacement of the overall structure. In addition, this study also used in vitro biomechanics test to investigate the stiffness of the structure after implantation, and used DIC to observe the displacement of the calcaneus structure after external force.
resultsUnder a simulated load in FEA, there are significant overall instability and high stress concentration on the calcaneal surrounding host bone and the plate/screws system, respectively, in group 2 compared with other groups. Regard to the mechanical testing with DIC system, significant increased rotation stability, maximum force and stiffness with the addition of diagonal screws. In comparison to Group 2, the increase of 112% and 157% in maximum force as well as 104% and 176% in stiffness were found in Group 3 and 4, respectively.
conclusionFor reducing stress concentration and enhancing overall stability, more than one-diagonal screw design is recommended and two-diagonal screws design will be superior. This study provided biomechanical references for further calcaneal implants design to prevent clinical failure after MDCO.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.