Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34595886›Full record

ReviewJournal of biomedical optics2021

Cellular effects of terahertz waves.

Olga P Cherkasova, Danil S Serdyukov, Eugenia F Nemova, Alexander S Ratushnyak, Anna S Kucheryavenko, Irina N Dolganova, Guofu Xu, Maksim Skorobogatiy, Igor V Reshetov, Peter S Timashev and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of biomedical optics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Olga P CherkasovaInstitute of Laser Physics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Russian Federation.
Danil S SerdyukovInstitute of Laser Physics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Russian Federation.
Eugenia F NemovaInstitute of Laser Physics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Russian Federation.
Alexander S RatushnyakInstitute of Computational Technologies of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Russian Federation.
Anna S KucheryavenkoInstitute of Solid State Physics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Russian Federation.
Irina N DolganovaInstitute of Solid State Physics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Russian Federation.
Guofu XuPolytechnique Montreal, Department of Engineering Physics, Canada.
Maksim SkorobogatiyPolytechnique Montreal, Department of Engineering Physics, Canada.
Igor V ReshetovSechenov University, Institute for Cluster Oncology, Russian Federation.
Peter S TimashevSechenov University, Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Russian Federation.
Igor E SpektorProkhorov General Physics Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Russian Federation.
Kirill I ZaytsevProkhorov General Physics Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Russian Federation.
Valery V TuchinSaratov State University, Russian Federation.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

significanceAn increasing interest in the area of biological effects at exposure of tissues and cells to the terahertz (THz) radiation is driven by a rapid progress in THz biophotonics, observed during the past decades. Despite the attractiveness of THz technology for medical diagnosis and therapy, there is still quite limited knowledge about safe limits of THz exposure. Different modes of THz exposure of tissues and cells, including continuous-wave versus pulsed radiation, various powers, and number and duration of exposure cycles, ought to be systematically studied.

aimWe provide an overview of recent research results in the area of biological effects at exposure of tissues and cells to THz waves. APPROACH: We start with a brief overview of general features of the THz-wave-tissue interactions, as well as modern THz emitters, with an emphasis on those that are reliable for studying the biological effects of THz waves. Then, we consider three levels of biological system organization, at which the exposure effects are considered: (i) solutions of biological molecules; (ii) cultures of cells, individual cells, and cell structures; and (iii) entire organs or organisms; special attention is devoted to the cellular level. We distinguish thermal and nonthermal mechanisms of THz-wave-cell interactions and discuss a problem of adequate estimation of the THz biological effects' specificity. The problem of experimental data reproducibility, caused by rareness of the THz experimental setups and an absence of unitary protocols, is also considered.

resultsThe summarized data demonstrate the current stage of the research activity and knowledge about the THz exposure on living objects.

conclusionsThis review helps the biomedical optics community to summarize up-to-date knowledge in the area of cell exposure to THz radiation, and paves the ways for the development of THz safety standards and THz therapeutic applications.

Indexed as

Optics and PhotonicsTerahertz RadiationReproducibility of Resultsthermal and nonthermal effects of THz wavesTHz biophotonicsTHz dosimetryTHz exposures of biological molecules, cells, and tissuesTHz medical diagnosis and therapyTHz technologyTHz-wave–tissue interactions

Identifiers

PMID34595886
PMCPMC8483303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.