Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34595737›Full record

ReviewCurrent obesity reports2021

Sexual Orientation and Obesity: What Do We Know?

Nicole A VanKim, Melissa N Laska

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current obesity reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nicole A VanKimDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Massachusetts Amherst School of Public Health and Health Sciences, 715 North Pleasant Street, Amherst, MA, 01003, USA. nvankim@umass.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6711-9127
Melissa N LaskaDivision of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
University of Massachusetts Amherst · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

Physiologic stress and sexual orientation disparities in risk for type 2 diabetes among womenK01DK123193 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST · PI VANKIM, NICOLE A · 2020 to 2023
$612k
NIDDK NIH HHS K01 DK123193NIDDK NIH HHS K01DK123193
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis review describes research addressing sexual orientation disparities in obesity and their sequelae, with a focus on new findings from the past year and areas for future work. RECENT

findingsSexual minority people of color experience important health disparities related to obesity. Sexual minority women may be at greater risk of developing type 2 diabetes than their heterosexual counterparts, potentially because of obesity-related disparities. Bisexual men also appear to experience more obesity and potential greater risk for type 2 diabetes than heterosexual men. Stigma and discrimination are important emerging areas for additional research to better understand sexual orientation disparities in obesity-related health. There is a need for intersectional research and longitudinal research that connects existing sexual orientation disparities in obesity with subsequent chronic disease development. Additionally, upstream efforts to understand the impact of stigma and discrimination on the weight-related health of sexual minority groups are needed.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHealth Status DisparitiesHeterosexualityHumansMaleObesitySexual BehaviorDisparitiesObesitySexual orientation

Identifiers

PMID34595737
OpenAlexW3203247582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.