Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34595733›Full record

ReviewNeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics2021

Clinical Trial Design for Disease-Modifying Therapies for Genetic Epilepsies.

Dylan C Brock, Scott Demarest, Tim A Benke

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Precision Treatments in Epilepsy.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2021
    Article
  9. Adeno-associated virus-mediated gene therapy for rare pediatric neurogenetic diseases: Current status and outlook.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dylan C Brock *Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA. Dylan.c.brock@gmail.com.
Scott DemarestDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
Tim A BenkeDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
University of Colorado Denver · USChildren's Hospital Colorado · US

Funding

Training and Career Development ComponentU54HD061222 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI PERCY, ALAN KENNETH · 2009 to 2019
$12.4M
Multi-Site Validation of Biomarkers and Core Clinical Outcome Measures for Clinical Trials Readiness in CDKL5 Deficiency DisorderU01NS114312 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI BENKE, TIMOTHY A, DOWNS, JENNY · 2021 to 2025
$4.7M
NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD061222NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS114312
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although trials with anti-seizure medications (ASMs) have not shown clear anti-epileptogenic or disease-modifying activity in humans to date, rapid advancements in genomic technology and emerging gene-mediated and gene replacement options offer hope for the successful development of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for genetic epilepsies. In fact, more than 26 potential DMTs are in various stages of preclinical and/or clinical development for genetic syndromes associated with epilepsy. The scope of disease-modification includes but is not limited to effects on the underlying pathophysiology, the condition's natural history, epilepsy severity, developmental achievement, function, behavior, sleep, and quality of life. While conventional regulatory clinical trials for epilepsy therapeutics have historically focused on seizure reduction, similarly designed trials may prove ill-equipped to identify these broader disease-modifying benefits. As we look forward to this pipeline of DMTs, focused consideration should be given to the challenges they pose to conventional clinical trial designs for epilepsy therapeutics. Just as DMTs promise to fundamentally alter how we approach the care of patients with genetic epilepsy syndromes, DMTs likewise challenge how we traditionally construct and measure the success of clinical trials. In the following, we briefly review the historical and preclinical frameworks for DMT development for genetic epilepsies and explore the many novel challenges posed for such trials, including the choice of suitable outcome measures, trial structure, timing and duration of treatment, feasible follow-up period, varying safety profile, and ethical concerns.

Indexed as

AnticonvulsantsClinical Trials as TopicEpilepsyGenetic TherapyGenomicsHumansAnticonvulsantsClinical trial designDevelopmental and epileptic encephalopathiesDisease-modifying therapyGenetic epilepsiesPrecision medicineRare disease

Identifiers

PMID34595733
PMCPMC8609073
OpenAlexW3202830521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.