Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34595685›Full record

ArticleNeurocritical care2022

Status Myoclonus with Post-cardiac-arrest Syndrome: Implications for Prognostication.

Tia Chakraborty, Sherri Braksick, Alejandro Rabinstein, Eelco Wijdicks

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurocritical care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. [Neurological prognosis after cardiac arrest and resuscitation].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Adult-Onset Myoclonus in a Large Urban Inpatient Setting: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Tremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.) · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tia ChakrabortyDivision of Neurocritical Care and Hospital Neurology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Sherri BraksickDivision of Neurocritical Care and Hospital Neurology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Alejandro RabinsteinDivision of Neurocritical Care and Hospital Neurology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Eelco WijdicksDivision of Neurocritical Care and Hospital Neurology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. wijde@mayo.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9807-9172
Mayo Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStatus myoclonus (SM) after cardiac arrest (CA) may signify devastating brain injury. We hypothesized that SM correlates with severe neurologic and systemic post-cardiac-arrest syndrome (PCAS).

methodsCharts of patients admitted with CA to Mayo Clinic Saint Marys Hospital between 2005 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Data included the neurologic examination, ancillary neurologic tests, and systemic markers of PCAS. Nonsustained myoclonus was clinically differentiated from SM. The cerebral performance category score at discharge was assessed; poor outcome was a cerebral performance category score > 2 prior to withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies or death.

resultsOf 296 patients included, 276 (93.2%) had out-of-hospital arrest and 202 (68.5%) had a shockable rhythm; the mean time to return of spontaneous circulation was 32 ± 19 min. One hundred seventy-six (59.5%) patients had a poor outcome. One hundred one (34.1%) patients had myoclonus, and 74 (73.2%) had SM. Neurologic predictors of poor outcome were extensor or absent motor response to noxious stimulus (p = 0.02, odds ratio [OR] 3.8, confidence interval [CI] 1.2-12.4), SM (p = 0.01, OR 10.3, CI 1.5-205.4), and burst suppression on EEG (p = 0.01, OR 4.6, CI 1.4-17.4). Of 74 patients with SM, 73 (98.6%) had a poor outcome. A nonshockable rhythm (p < 0.001, OR 4.5, CI 2.6-7.9), respiratory arrest (p < 0.001, OR 3.5, CI 1.7-7.2), chronic kidney disease (p < 0.001, OR 3.1, CI 1.6-6.0), and a pressor requirement (p < 0.001, OR 4.4, CI 1.8-10.6) were associated with SM. No patients with SM, anoxic-ischemic magnetic resonance imaging findings, and absent electroencephalographic reactivity had a good outcome.

conclusionsSustained status myoclonus after CPR is observed in patients with other reliable indicators of severe acute brain injury and systemic PCAS. These clinical determinants should be incorporated as part of a comprehensive approach to prognostication after CA.

Indexed as

Cardiopulmonary ResuscitationHeart ArrestMyoclonusOut-of-Hospital Cardiac ArrestPost-Cardiac Arrest SyndromeElectroencephalographyHumansRetrospective StudiesMyoclonusPost-cardiac-arrest syndromePrognostication

Identifiers

PMID34595685
OpenAlexW3202994528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.