Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34595594›Full record

ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2022

At The Forefront of Penile Surgical Reconstruction: A Bibliometric Study of the 100 Most-Cited Articles.

Minliang Wu, Rui Chen, Yalong Xu, Xiaolei Shi, Ruixiang Song, Mengyan Sun, Chunyu Xue, Yuchong Wang, Wei Zhang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Minliang Wu *Department of Plastic Surgery, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, 168 Changhai Rd, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Rui Chen *Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, 168 Changhai Rd, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Yalong Xu *Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, 168 Changhai Rd, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Xiaolei ShiDepartment of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, 168 Changhai Rd, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Ruixiang SongDepartment of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, 168 Changhai Rd, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Mengyan SunDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, 168 Changhai Rd, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Chunyu XueDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, 168 Changhai Rd, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Yuchong WangDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, 168 Changhai Rd, Shanghai, 200433, China. drwangyc@163.com.
Wei ZhangDepartment of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, 168 Changhai Rd, Shanghai, 200433, China. zhweismmu@163.com.ORCID 0000-0002-0015-7855

Funding

Shanghai Municipal Commission of Health and Family Planning Clinical Research Program 20184Y0113Shanghai Sailing Program 18YF1422600Shanghai Sailing Program 19YF1447300
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe citation count of a scientific article is considered as the recognition it received from this field. The purpose of this bibliometric analysis was to identify the top 100 most-cited scientific articles in penile surgical reconstruction.

methodsThe Web of Science database was used to extract the top 100 most-cited articles. Individual articles were reviewed to identify the authorship, published journal, journal impact factor (IF), primary disease, article type, institution and country of origin, and year of publication.

resultsThe top 100 most-cited articles were published between 1947 and 2013. The number of citations ranged from 23 to 233. Journal of Urology contributed the most articles (n = 36). Articles with a high level of evidence like prospective analysis (n = 5), systematic review and meta-analysis (n = 2), and guideline (n = 1) were all published after 2000. The average citation per year of articles published in high-IF journals was significantly higher than that of other articles (p = 0.0129). There was a positive linear correlation between citation count per year and publication year (r

conclusionsThe analysis of top 100 most-cited articles facilitates the comprehensive recognition of current focus in the field of penile surgical reconstruction, which is the exploration of flaps and development of new techniques in penile reconstruction. In the future, more attention should be paid to evidence-based medicine to provide high-level evidence for research. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Indexed as

BibliometricsEvidence-Based MedicineHumansMalePenisPlastic Surgery ProceduresBibliometric analysisFlapPenisReconstructionSurgery

Identifiers

PMID34595594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.