ArticleProgress in rehabilitation medicine2021
Gait Training after Stroke with a Wearable Robotic Device: A Case Report of Further Improvements in Walking Ability after a Recovery Plateau.
Article in Progress in rehabilitation medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative analysis of surgical approaches in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of comparative outcomes including primary and revision cases.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Pooled it
- Application of electromyographic biofeedback therapy in physical dysfunction rehabilitation and post-stroke anxiety reduction in stroke survivors.World journal of psychiatry · 2025Article
- Gait training using a wearable robotic hip device for incomplete spinal cord injury: A preliminary study.The journal of spinal cord medicine · 2025Observational
- Analysis of muscle synergy and gait kinematics during regain of gait function through rehabilitation in a monoplegic patient.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundConventional rehabilitation is known to improve walking ability after stoke, but its effectiveness is often limited. Recent studies have shown that gait training combining conventional rehabilitation and robotic devices in stroke patients provides better results than conventional rehabilitation alone, suggesting that gait training with a robotic device may lead to further improvements in the walking ability recovered by conventional rehabilitation. Therefore, the aim of this report was to highlight the changes in kinematic and electromyographic data recorded during walking before and after gait training with the Honda Walking Assist Device CASE: The patient was a 42-year-old man with severe hemiplegia caused by right putaminal hemorrhage. He underwent conventional rehabilitation for 20 weeks following the onset of stroke, after which his walking speed reached a recovery plateau. Subsequently, we added robotic rehabilitation using HWAT to his regular rehabilitation regimen, which resulted in improved step length symmetry and gait endurance. We also noted changes in muscle activity patterns during walking. DISCUSSION: HWAT further improved the walking ability of a patient who had recovered with conventional rehabilitation; this improvement was accompanied by changes in muscle activity patterns during walking. The improvement in gait endurance exceeded the smallest meaningful change in stroke patients, suggesting that this improvement represented a noticeable enhancement in the quality of life in relation to mobility in the community. Further clinical trials are needed to confirm the results of the present case study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.