Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34595208›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in molecular biosciences2021

Molecular Brightness Approach for FRET Analysis of Donor-Linker-Acceptor Constructs at the Single Molecule Level: A Concept.

Taryn M Kay, Cody P Aplin, Rowan Simonet, Julie Beenken, Robert C Miller, Christin Libal, Arnold J Boersma, Erin D Sheets, Ahmed A Heikal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Taryn M KayDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Minnesota Duluth, Duluth, MN, United States.
Cody P AplinDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Minnesota Duluth, Duluth, MN, United States.
Rowan SimonetDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Minnesota Duluth, Duluth, MN, United States.
Julie BeenkenDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Minnesota Duluth, Duluth, MN, United States.
Robert C MillerDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Minnesota Duluth, Duluth, MN, United States.
Christin LibalDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Minnesota Duluth, Duluth, MN, United States.
Arnold J BoersmaDWI-Leibniz Institute for Interactive Materials, Aachen, Germany.
Erin D SheetsDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Minnesota Duluth, Duluth, MN, United States.
Ahmed A HeikalDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Minnesota Duluth, Duluth, MN, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this report, we have developed a simple approach using single-detector fluorescence autocorrelation spectroscopy (FCS) to investigate the Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) of genetically encoded, freely diffusing crTC2.1 (mTurquoise2.1-linker-mCitrine) at the single molecule level. We hypothesize that the molecular brightness of the freely diffusing donor (mTurquoise2.1) in the presence of the acceptor (mCitrine) is lower than that of the donor alone due to FRET. To test this hypothesis, the fluorescence fluctuation signal and number of molecules of freely diffusing construct were measured using FCS to calculate the molecular brightness of the donor, excited at 405 nm and detected at 475/50 nm, in the presence and absence of the acceptor. Our results indicate that the molecular brightness of cleaved crTC2.1 in a buffer is larger than that of the intact counterpart under 405-nm excitation. The energy transfer efficiency at the single molecule level is larger and more spread in values as compared with the ensemble-averaging time-resolved fluorescence measurements. In contrast, the molecular brightness of the intact crTC2.1, under 488 nm excitation of the acceptor (531/40 nm detection), is the same or slightly larger than that of the cleaved counterpart. These FCS-FRET measurements on freely diffusing donor-acceptor pairs are independent of the precise time constants associated with autocorrelation curves due to the presence of potential photophysical processes. Ultimately, when used in living cells, the proposed approach would only require a low expression level of these genetically encoded constructs, helping to limit potential interference with the cell machinery.

Indexed as

crTC2.1donor-linker-acceptorFCSFRETmCitrinemolecular brightnessmTurquoise2.1single molecule

Identifiers

PMID34595208
PMCPMC8476790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.