ArticleFrontiers in medicine2021
Discrimination Between Invasive and
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessment of high- and low-risk histopathologic subtypes of basal cell carcinoma using artificial intelligence and dermatologist evaluation.JAAD international · 2026Article
- Comparative Dermoscopic Analysis of Melanoma In Situ Versus Thin Invasive Melanoma Considering BRAF Mutational Status.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Performance of a Machine Learning Algorithm on Lesions with a High Preoperative Suspicion of Invasive Melanoma.Acta dermato-venereologica · 2024Article
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of artificial intelligence versus clinicians for skin cancer diagnosis.NPJ digital medicine · 2024Review
- How Does a Convolutional Neural Network Trained to Differentiate between Invasive Melanoma and Melanoma In situ Generalize when Assessing Dysplastic Naevi?Acta dermato-venereologica · 2023Article
- Evaluation of Melanoma Thickness with Clinical Close-up and Dermoscopic Images Using a Convolutional Neural Network.Acta dermato-venereologica · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.