Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34595173›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2021

Validation, Optimization, and Application of the Zebrafish Developmental Toxicity Assay for Pharmaceuticals Under the ICH S5(R3) Guideline.

Yi-Sheng Song, Ming-Zhu Dai, Chen-Xia Zhu, Yan-Feng Huang, Jing Liu, Cheng-Da Zhang, Feng Xie, Yi Peng, Yong Zhang, Chun-Qi Li and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. A novel bacterial symbiont in the seaweedFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Chemical-induced heart defects using a transgenic zebrafish model.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2025
    Article
  5. Detection of developmental toxicity of the anti-COVID-19 drug molnupiravir using gastruloid-based in vitro assays.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Effects ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Unravelling the developmental toxicity of heavy metals using zebrafish as a model: a narrative review.Biometals : an international journal on the role of metal ions in biology, biochemistry, and medicine · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yi-Sheng SongCenter of Safety Evaluation and Research, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China.
Ming-Zhu DaiHunter Biotechnology, Inc., Hangzhou, China.
Chen-Xia ZhuCenter of Safety Evaluation and Research, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China.
Yan-Feng HuangHunter Biotechnology, Inc., Hangzhou, China.
Jing LiuCenter of Safety Evaluation and Research, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China.
Cheng-Da ZhangCenter of Safety Evaluation and Research, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China.
Feng XieCenter of Safety Evaluation and Research, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China.
Yi PengHunter Biotechnology, Inc., Hangzhou, China.
Yong ZhangKey Laboratory of Drug Safety Evaluation and Research of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou Medical College (Zhejiang Academy of Medical Sciences), Hangzhou, China.
Chun-Qi LiKey Laboratory of Drug Safety Evaluation and Research of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou Medical College (Zhejiang Academy of Medical Sciences), Hangzhou, China.
Li-Jiang ZhangCenter of Safety Evaluation and Research, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The zebrafish as an alternative animal model for developmental toxicity testing has been extensively investigated, but its assay protocol was not harmonized yet. This study has validated and optimized the zebrafish developmental toxicity assay previously reported by multiple inter-laboratory studies in the United States and Europe. In this study, using this classical protocol, of 31 ICH-positive compounds, 23 compounds (74.2%) were teratogenic in zebrafish, five had false-negative results, and three were neither teratogenic nor non-teratogenic according to the protocol standard; of 14 ICH-negative compounds, 12 compounds (85.7%) were non-teratogenic in zebrafish and two had false-positive results. After we added an additional TI value in the zebrafish treated with testing compounds at 2 dpf along with the original 5 dpf, proposed a new category as the uncategorized compounds for those TI values smaller than the cutoff both at 2 dpf and 5 dpf but inducing toxic phenotypes, refined the testing concentration ranges, and optimized the TI cut-off value from ≥ 10 to ≥ 3 for compounds with refined testing concentrations, this optimized zebrafish developmental assay reached 90.3% sensitivity (28/31 positive compounds were teratogenic in zebrafish) and 88.9% (40/45) overall predictability. Our results from this study strongly support the use of zebrafish as an alternative

Indexed as

alternative methoddevelopmental toxicityembryo-fetal lethality (MEFL)ICH S5(R3)malformationteratogenicityzebrafish

Identifiers

PMID34595173
PMCPMC8476914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.